From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030429AbWGIATE (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 20:19:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030430AbWGIATD (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 20:19:03 -0400 Received: from beauty.rexursive.com ([203.171.74.242]:43705 "EHLO beauty.rexursive.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030429AbWGIATB (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 20:19:01 -0400 Subject: Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson From: Bojan Smojver To: Pavel Machek Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Arjan van de Ven , Sunil Kumar , Avuton Olrich , Olivier Galibert , Jan Rychter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net, grundig , Nigel Cunningham In-Reply-To: <20060708235336.GF2546@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20060627133321.GB3019@elf.ucw.cz> <1152377434.3120.69.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <200607082125.12819.rjw@sisk.pl> <1152402366.2584.10.camel@coyote.rexursive.com> <20060708235336.GF2546@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 10:18:58 +1000 Message-Id: <1152404338.2584.14.camel@coyote.rexursive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 01:53 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > swsusp/uswsusp share 75% or so of code, and we can't really drop > swsusp soon, because that would break existing setups. Warning > year-or-so ahead is needed to do such big changes. Plus you are quite > right n that "heavy to setup" thing. Ah, right. Thanks for clearing that up. So, the plan is that in about a year or so there won't be any completely in-kernel suspend implementations, only uswsusp? -- Bojan