From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clean up old names in tty code to current names
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:43:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1152539034.27368.124.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e4733910607100603r5ae1a21ex1a2fa0f045424fd1@mail.gmail.com>
Ar Llu, 2006-07-10 am 09:03 -0400, ysgrifennodd Jon Smirl:
> I agree with this. I made a mistake with the pts vs pty, why not just
> help me fix the mistake instead of rejecting everything? Some the of
> the info being reported in /proc/tty/drivers is wrong (vc./0 - from
> the devfs attempt?). or missing.
What are you trying to achieve and where are you trying to get. If you
want better info for the tty layer then get the new info working in
sysfs first. Then when people are generally using sysfs you can worry
about cleaning up/removing/breaking the old stuff.
> I'm not going to solve this problem but it is something that needs to
> be discussed. Are we really going to maintain parallel naming schemes,
> one in-kernel and one out of kernel? I'm not even sure if USB will
> work without udev anymore.
It works fine, it would not suprise me if udev users were still the
minority case in fact.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-10 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-10 4:11 [PATCH] Clean up old names in tty code to current names Jon Smirl
2006-07-10 4:54 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-10 7:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-10 9:44 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-10 12:41 ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-10 13:10 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-10 13:03 ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-10 13:12 ` CaT
2006-07-10 13:18 ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-10 13:43 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2006-07-10 14:07 ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-10 14:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-07-10 14:37 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-10 14:42 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-07-10 14:57 ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-10 15:19 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-10 15:10 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-07-10 15:21 ` Russell King
2006-07-10 15:38 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-07-10 15:35 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2006-07-10 15:54 ` Jon Smirl
2006-07-10 16:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-10 22:14 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-07-10 18:13 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-11 21:54 ` Greg KH
2006-07-11 21:52 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-11 2:18 Albert Cahalan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1152539034.27368.124.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox