From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750909AbWGKJyn (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 05:54:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750913AbWGKJyn (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 05:54:43 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:4490 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750902AbWGKJym (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 05:54:42 -0400 Subject: Re: tty's use of file_list_lock and file_move From: Alan Cox To: Jon Smirl Cc: Theodore Tso , lkml In-Reply-To: <9e4733910607101916y4638c097ie26ae63a9949bc3e@mail.gmail.com> References: <9e4733910607100810r6e02f69g9a3f6d3d1400b397@mail.gmail.com> <1152552806.27368.187.camel@localhost.localdomain> <9e4733910607101027g5f3386feq5fc54f7593214139@mail.gmail.com> <1152554708.27368.202.camel@localhost.localdomain> <9e4733910607101535i7f395686p7450dc524d9b82ae@mail.gmail.com> <1152573312.27368.212.camel@localhost.localdomain> <9e4733910607101604j16c54ef0r966f72f3501cfd2b@mail.gmail.com> <9e4733910607101649m21579ae2p9372cced67283615@mail.gmail.com> <20060711012904.GD30332@thunk.org> <9e4733910607101916y4638c097ie26ae63a9949bc3e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:12:32 +0100 Message-Id: <1152612752.18028.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.5) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ar Llu, 2006-07-10 am 22:16 -0400, ysgrifennodd Jon Smirl: > I'm not looking for performance gains, I'm looking more to isolate the > tty code down to a minimal set of interactions with the rest of the > kernel. RIght now it is all intertwined. That might be tricky given that hangup and SAK have to directly interact with the VFS locking. Alan