From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750773AbWGKUNg (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:13:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750947AbWGKUNg (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:13:36 -0400 Received: from beauty.rexursive.com ([203.171.74.242]:43443 "EHLO beauty.rexursive.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750773AbWGKUNf (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:13:35 -0400 Subject: Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson From: Bojan Smojver To: Jason Lunz Cc: Nigel Cunningham , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net In-Reply-To: <20060711144743.GA24187@knob.reflex> References: <20060627133321.GB3019@elf.ucw.cz> <200607100706.45789.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> <200607101620.34408.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> <20060711144743.GA24187@knob.reflex> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 06:13:28 +1000 Message-Id: <1152648808.2775.11.camel@coyote.rexursive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 10:47 -0400, Jason Lunz wrote: > I would suggest testing swsusp before each suspend2 release. It's not > difficult at all to maintain a system that can suspend to disk using > either method, especially if you use something like Bernard's hibernate > scripts. I think this is a great idea. When Suspend2 hits the -mm and the mainline, all this should get a lot more testing, so problems will surface more quickly. -- Bojan