Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: Suspend2 - Request for review & inclusion in -mm)

Pavel Machek
2006-06-28T22:46:41Z

On Thu 2006-06-29 00:37:57, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Thursday 29 June 2006 00:24, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > Okay, can I get some details? Like how much memory does system have,
> > > > what stress test causes the failure?
> > >
> > > The machine has 1GB of RAM, filling it up beyond 500MB, maybe 600MB
> > > usually made swsusp a problem. I'd need to close apps then to be able to
> > > suspend.
> >
> > I'm pretty sure I do suspending with most of RAM full. You have
> > big-enough swap partition, right?
>
> 1 GB, it might not be completely empty though. I probably only hit swsusp
> limit much earlier than suspend2's (which after 34 suspend/resume cycles and
> heavy use in between I did not hit yet).

Okay, can we get bugzilla.kernel.org report? (assigned-to me)

This really should not happen, and I did not see swsusp fail like that
for quite a long time. I _could_ make it fail with make -j on kernel,
and similar crazy loads, but on nothing reasonable.

dmesg from failed run would be nice, too.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html