public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Joseph Fannin <jfannin@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arjan@infradead.org,
	John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
	Chase Venters <chase.venters@clientec.com>
Subject: [PATCH] remove unnecessary barrier in rtc_get_rtc_time
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 23:57:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1152849473.1883.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060711074541.GA5263@elte.hu>

On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 09:45 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> 
> ouch! That's another HPET bug i believe. AFAICS rtc_get_rtc_time() is 
> really not meant to be called from any sort of timer interrupt! In 
> particular this looping code:
> 
>         while (rtc_is_updating() != 0 && jiffies - uip_watchdog < 2*HZ/100) {
>                 barrier();
>                 cpu_relax();
>         }

Seeing this after reading the volatile thread and then Chase's patch:

([PATCH] Make cpu_relax() imply barrier() on all arches)
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=115237514517594&w=2

(yes I'm a bit behind in my LKML reading... 1663 messages to go)

There's no reason to have a barrier in this loop.

-- Steve

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Index: linux-2.6.18-rc1/drivers/char/rtc.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-rc1.orig/drivers/char/rtc.c	2006-07-13 23:40:58.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc1/drivers/char/rtc.c	2006-07-13 23:41:06.000000000 -0400
@@ -1238,10 +1238,8 @@ void rtc_get_rtc_time(struct rtc_time *r
 	 * Once the read clears, read the RTC time (again via ioctl). Easy.
 	 */
 
-	while (rtc_is_updating() != 0 && jiffies - uip_watchdog < 2*HZ/100) {
-		barrier();
+	while (rtc_is_updating() != 0 && jiffies - uip_watchdog < 2*HZ/100)
 		cpu_relax();
-	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Only the values that we read from the RTC are set. We leave



  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-14  3:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-09  5:05 [LOCKDEP] 2.6.18-rc1: inconsistent {hardirq-on-W} -> {in-hardirq-W} usage Joseph Fannin
2006-07-09  6:25 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-09  7:45   ` Ingo Molnar
2006-07-11  5:11     ` Joseph Fannin
2006-07-11  7:45       ` [patch] lockdep: HPET/RTC fix Ingo Molnar
2006-07-14  3:57         ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2006-08-05 21:59         ` Joseph Fannin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1152849473.1883.19.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=chase.venters@clientec.com \
    --cc=jfannin@gmail.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox