From: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk>
To: Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>,
Torsten Landschoff <torsten@debian.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:25:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1153322726.25089.1.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200607191343.33502.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 13:43 +0100, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 July 2006 11:21, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 08:57 +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 12:29:41AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> > > > Hi friends,
> > >
> > > Hi Torsten,
> > >
> > > > I upgraded to 2.6.18-rc1 on sunday, with the following results (taken
> > > > from my /var/log/kern.log), which ultimately led me to reinstall my
> > > > system:
> > > >
> > > > Jul 17 07:33:53 pulsar kernel: xfs_da_do_buf: bno 16777216
> > > > Jul 17 07:33:53 pulsar kernel: dir: inode 54526538
> > >
> > > I suspect you had some residual directory corruption from using the
> > > 2.6.17 XFS (which is known to have a lurking dir2 corruption issue,
> > > fixed in the latest -stable point release).
> >
> > This has me very worried.
> >
> > i just upgraded to .18-rc1-git5 when it came out, i used .17-rc3 before.
> > does this mean my .17-rc3 may have corrupted my filesystem?
> >
> > what action do you suggest i do now?
> >
> > > > of programs fail in mysterious ways. I tried to recover using
> > > > xfs_repair but I feel that my partition is thorougly borked. Of course
> > > > no data was lost due to backups but still I'd like this bug to be fixed
> > > > ;-)
> > >
> > > 2.6.18-rc1 should be fine (contains the corruption fix). Did you
> > > mkfs and restore? Or at least get a full repair run? If you did,
> > > and you still see issues in .18-rc1, please let me know asap.
> > >
> > > thanks.
>
> According to another thread Nathan just responded to, it sounds like we need
> to wait for a new version of the xfsprogs package, and then run xfs_repair on
> the affected filesystems. I wouldn't worry about it too much if you've not
> had any crashes. The damage can be repaired, just not right now.
without ANY loss? because even though it would be abit painful for me to
do, i do have the option of smashing in a new drive, copy everything,
and reinitialize my filesystem.
>
> I'm still waiting for a crash on a machine that has been under heavy load for
> 28 days, so it's obviously not _that_ easy to trigger.
so basically if i upgrade to a safe kernel before i do get these errors,
im good?
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-19 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-18 22:29 XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 Torsten Landschoff
2006-07-18 22:57 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-19 8:08 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-19 22:56 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 10:29 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-19 10:21 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-19 12:43 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-19 15:25 ` Kasper Sandberg [this message]
2006-07-19 22:59 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 7:13 ` FAQ updated (was Re: XFS breakage...) Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 12:42 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2006-07-20 13:28 ` David Greaves
2006-07-20 16:11 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-20 22:14 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 22:18 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 22:24 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 22:43 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 22:52 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 22:55 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 22:57 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 23:00 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 23:10 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 23:12 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-20 23:15 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 23:19 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 15:13 ` Kevin Radloff
2006-07-20 16:51 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-31 16:25 ` Jan Kasprzak
2006-07-31 16:38 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-08-02 4:32 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-19 21:14 ` XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 Torsten Landschoff
2006-07-19 23:09 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-22 16:27 ` Christian Kujau
2006-07-23 23:01 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-28 17:01 ` Christian Kujau
2006-07-28 21:48 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-29 20:22 ` Ralf Hildebrandt
2006-07-29 22:28 ` David Chatterton
2006-07-18 23:06 ` Kevin Radloff
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-19 14:17 Mattias Hedenskog
2006-07-19 14:59 ` Jeffrey E. Hundstad
2006-07-19 23:01 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 5:51 ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2006-07-19 21:09 ` Torsten Landschoff
2006-07-20 10:46 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1153322726.25089.1.camel@localhost \
--to=lkml@metanurb.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathans@sgi.com \
--cc=s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk \
--cc=torsten@debian.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox