From: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk>
To: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
Cc: Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>,
Torsten Landschoff <torsten@debian.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 12:29:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1153391342.31822.4.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060720085636.D1947140@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 08:56 +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 09:08:30AM +0100, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 July 2006 23:57, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > > of programs fail in mysterious ways. I tried to recover using xfs_repair
> > > > but I feel that my partition is thorougly borked. Of course no data was
> > > > lost due to backups but still I'd like this bug to be fixed ;-)
> > >
> > > 2.6.18-rc1 should be fine (contains the corruption fix). Did you
> > > mkfs and restore? Or at least get a full repair run? If you did,
> > > and you still see issues in .18-rc1, please let me know asap.
> >
> > Just out of interest, I've got a few XFS volumes that were created 24 months
> > ago on a machine that I upgraded to 2.6.17 about a month ago. I haven't seen
> > any crashes so far.
> >
> > Assuming I get the newest XFS repair tools on there, what's the disadvantage
> > of repairing versus creating a new filesystem? What special circumstances are
> > required to cause a crash?
>
> There should be no disadvantage to repairing. I will update the FAQ
> shortly to describe all the details of the problem, recommendations
> on how to address it, which kernel version is affected, etc.
this FAQ, is it this: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#dir2 ?
(btw, it seems that while only in the TOC once, you have the same about
2.6.17 twice..)..
which version of xfsprogs should i use while doing the xfs_check ?
>
> cheers.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-20 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-18 22:29 XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 Torsten Landschoff
2006-07-18 22:57 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-19 8:08 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-19 22:56 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 10:29 ` Kasper Sandberg [this message]
2006-07-19 10:21 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-19 12:43 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-19 15:25 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-19 22:59 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 7:13 ` FAQ updated (was Re: XFS breakage...) Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 12:42 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2006-07-20 13:28 ` David Greaves
2006-07-20 16:11 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-20 22:14 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 22:18 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 22:24 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 22:43 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 22:52 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 22:55 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 22:57 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 23:00 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 23:10 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 23:12 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-20 23:15 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 23:19 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 15:13 ` Kevin Radloff
2006-07-20 16:51 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-31 16:25 ` Jan Kasprzak
2006-07-31 16:38 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-08-02 4:32 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-19 21:14 ` XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 Torsten Landschoff
2006-07-19 23:09 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-22 16:27 ` Christian Kujau
2006-07-23 23:01 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-28 17:01 ` Christian Kujau
2006-07-28 21:48 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-29 20:22 ` Ralf Hildebrandt
2006-07-29 22:28 ` David Chatterton
2006-07-18 23:06 ` Kevin Radloff
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-19 14:17 Mattias Hedenskog
2006-07-19 14:59 ` Jeffrey E. Hundstad
2006-07-19 23:01 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 5:51 ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2006-07-19 21:09 ` Torsten Landschoff
2006-07-20 10:46 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1153391342.31822.4.camel@localhost \
--to=lkml@metanurb.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathans@sgi.com \
--cc=s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk \
--cc=torsten@debian.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox