From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932172AbWGXODY (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:03:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932174AbWGXODX (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:03:23 -0400 Received: from amsfep17-int.chello.nl ([213.46.243.15]:36766 "EHLO amsfep12-int.chello.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932172AbWGXODX (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:03:23 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add maintainer for memory management From: Peter Zijlstra To: Steven Rostedt Cc: LKML , Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter , linux-mm@kvack.org In-Reply-To: <1153713707.4002.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1153713707.4002.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 16:03:15 +0200 Message-Id: <1153749795.23798.19.camel@lappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Steven, The way I understand the maintainership of the memory management code is as follows: there is explicitly no maintainer listed. This code is so sensitive and has interactions with so many other sub-systems that it would not be doable to look at it from all possible angles by only one person. As it stands its more a group of people headed by Linus, Andrew and Hugh. Peter