From: Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org>
To: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>,
greg@kroah.com, jeff@garzik.org, harmon@ksu.edu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add SATA device to VIA IRQ quirk fixup list
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:06:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1153922774.4486.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44C77544.1050205@gentoo.org>
On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 14:59 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> > I want put here something like: if ( dev->irq != XT-PIC) return and
> > don't quirk this dev.
>
> I can't explain why, but this is not sufficient. Gentoo now have 2
> completely separate bug reports where the quirk is *only* needed when
> ACPI/APIC are enabled.
>
No, Quirks are only need when interrupts are in XT-PIC. (is my bet).
When APIC and ACPI is enabled (and working) we don't need quirks.
Someone said on XT-PIC VIA system, don't need, to boot, quirks when ACPI
is disabled, but this statement don't prove that the quirk aren't need
it .
--
Sérgio M. B.
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/138036
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/141082
>
> I'm not disputing that there are other systems where the opposite is
> true, but at least with our current level of understanding we cannot
> apply the quirk on an irq-type basis.
>
> Daniel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-26 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-14 9:52 [PATCH] Add SATA device to VIA IRQ quirk fixup list Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 11:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-14 11:40 ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 11:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-14 12:15 ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 12:51 ` Sergey Vlasov
2006-07-14 13:20 ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 14:43 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-14 15:42 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-14 16:01 ` Scott J. Harmon
2006-07-14 16:17 ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 16:16 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-14 16:24 ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 16:33 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-14 16:51 ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 16:48 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-07-14 17:06 ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-14 17:21 ` Sergey Vlasov
2006-07-14 15:46 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-07-14 16:13 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-15 0:10 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-07-16 14:09 ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-16 18:31 ` Greg KH
2006-07-17 0:34 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-25 4:40 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-26 0:42 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-26 12:45 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-07-26 13:59 ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-26 14:06 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto [this message]
2006-07-26 14:31 ` Daniel Drake
2006-07-26 15:11 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-07-26 22:14 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-07-14 23:58 ` Chris Wedgwood
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-14 19:26 Brown, Len
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1153922774.4486.7.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=harmon@ksu.edu \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox