From: Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>
To: Edgar Toernig <froese@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] /dev/itimer
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:33:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1154126015.2451.13.camel@entropy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060728235951.7de534eb.froese@gmx.de>
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 23:59 +0200, Edgar Toernig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is a simple driver which provides interval timers via
> file descriptors.
>
> Everytime I have to write code to do something at regular
> intervals I face the problem that the time routines on Unix
> are pretty archaic. Only a single process wide timer which
> notifies via signals. The single timer asks for a dedicated
> roll-your-own timer infrastructur, usually implemented via
> a lot of gettimeofday calls and appropriate select timeouts.
> But even if the single timer is enough, the delivery via
> signals is error prone and breaks a lot of (i.e. library)
> code, especially when the timer rate is high. One common
> work around is forking a separate task which gets the signals
> and a pipe to notify the main process which may select/poll
> the other and of the pipe. But this is pretty heavy-weight
> and not easy to get right either. Recently, people started
> to use the real time clock driver (/dev/rtc) to get an fd
> to sleep on. But this is even worse as there's (usually)
> only a single one in the whole system and you have to decide
> whether i.e. mplayer, artsd, timidity, or vdr gets it.
Pretty much everything in this paragraph is wrong, except for the part
about the difficulty of making a single unified event loop and the
resulting pipe hack that everybody uses to get around that.
Solaris lets you specify SIGEV_PORT in your struct sigevent which then
queues timer completions (or anything else that takes a struct sigevent,
like POSIX AIO) to a port and then all types of queued events (including
fd polling and user generated events) can be waited on and fetched with
a single function call.
Something similar could probably worked up in Linux which queues timer
completions to an AIO context.
You might also want to look into the event channel / kevent discussion
that's currently in progress.
--
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-28 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-28 21:59 [RFC] /dev/itimer Edgar Toernig
2006-07-28 22:33 ` Nicholas Miell [this message]
2006-07-28 22:44 ` Edgar Toernig
2006-07-28 23:14 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-07-28 22:43 ` DervishD
2006-07-28 23:01 ` Edgar Toernig
2006-08-01 14:40 ` Clemens Ladisch
2006-08-01 15:32 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1154126015.2451.13.camel@entropy \
--to=nmiell@comcast.net \
--cc=froese@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox