Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel

Rob Landley
2005-12-11T05:35:46Z

On Saturday 10 December 2005 07:41, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Given that CL has minimal (essentially no) maintenence cost,

then by your own admission maintaining it as an external patch for people who
need it for legacy reasons is trivial, and removing it to discourage new
users from picking it up remains a good idea.

Rob
--
Steve Ballmer: Innovation! Inigo Montoya: You keep using that word.
I do not think it means what you think it means.