Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]

Avi Kivity
2006-08-01T09:57:08Z

Matthias Andree wrote:
>
> No, it is valid to run the test on commodity hardware, but if you (or
> the benchmark rather) is claiming "transactions", I tend to think
> "ACID", and I highly doubt any 200 GB SATA drive manages 3000
> synchronous writes per second without causing either serious
> fragmentation or background block moving.
>
You are assuming 1 transaction = 1 sync write. That's not true.
Databases and log filesystems can get much more out of a disk write.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function