Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]

Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-01T13:56:36Z

>> >I didn't mean to say your particular drive were crap, but 200GB SATA
>> >drives are low end, like it or not --
>>
>> And you think an 18 GB SCSI disk just does it better because it's SCSI?
>
>18 GB SCSI disks are 1999 gear, so who cares?
>Seagate didn't sell 200 GB SATA drives at that time.
>
>> Esp. in long sequential reads.
>
>You think SCSI drives aren't on par? Right, they're ahead.
>98 MB/s for the fastest SCSI drives vs. 88 MB/s for Raptor 150 GB SATA
>and 74 MB/s for the fastest other ATA drives.

Uhuh. And how do they measure that? Did they actually ran sth like...
dd_rescue /dev/hda /dev/null

Jan Engelhardt
--