Re: suspend2 merge history [was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]

Pavel Machek
2006-07-30T23:08:15Z

On Sun 2006-07-30 15:25:49, Hua Zhong wrote:
> > I don't _blame_ drivers. I only wanted to say this: "If
> > Nigel knows that some drivers need to be fixed and he has
> > working fixes for these drivers, he should have submitted
> > these fixes for merging instead of just keeping them in
> > suspend2". Period.
> >
> > If I know of a fix for a driver, I always do my best to make
> > sure the fix will get considered for merging at least. The
> > problem is I'm not a driver expert and I can't provide the
> > fixes myself.
>
> Suspend2 patch is open source. You can always take a look.

swsusp is open source. You can always take a look. And you can always
submit a patch.

> Moreover, if someone claims suspend2 isn't ready for merge, or the

Moreover, if someone claims swsusp is broken, they should attach
bugzilla id.

> I'm not exactly an expert, but I don't think suspend-to-ram is more
> difficult than suspend-to-disk (probably quite the contrary), and
> there are a lot in common.

As you said, you do not know what you are talking about.

Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html