From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: dwalker@mvista.com
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] -mm clocksource: increase initcall priority
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 11:39:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1154716784.5327.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060804032510.405094000@mvista.com>
First of all, sorry for not reviewing these patches sooner. Its been
sitting in on my todo list for way too long. Thanks for continuing to
push it despite my slowness.
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 20:24 -0700, dwalker@mvista.com wrote:
> plain text document attachment (clocksource_init_call.patch)
> Since it's likely that this interface would get used during bootup
> I moved all the clocksource registration into the postcore initcall.
> This also eliminated some clocksource shuffling during bootup.
This one looks interesting. As long as it works as advertised I'm fine
with it, although I worry it might bring up some initialization ordering
issues. It will need some careful testing in -mm.
thanks
-john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-04 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-04 3:24 [PATCH 00/10] -mm generic clocksoure API dwalker
2006-08-04 3:24 ` [PATCH 01/10] -mm clocksource: increase initcall priority dwalker
2006-08-04 18:39 ` john stultz [this message]
2006-08-04 3:24 ` [PATCH 02/10] -mm clocksource: small cleanup dwalker
2006-08-04 18:40 ` john stultz
2006-08-04 3:24 ` [PATCH 03/10] -mm clocksource: enable plist dwalker
2006-08-04 3:24 ` [PATCH 04/10] -mm clocksource: add some new API calls dwalker
2006-08-04 19:06 ` john stultz
2006-08-04 19:28 ` Daniel Walker
2006-08-04 21:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-08-04 3:24 ` [PATCH 05/10] -mm clocksource: convert generic timeofday dwalker
2006-08-04 3:24 ` [PATCH 06/10] -mm clocksource: add block notifier dwalker
2006-08-04 3:24 ` [PATCH 07/10] -mm clocksource: remove update_callback dwalker
2006-08-04 19:28 ` john stultz
2006-08-04 3:24 ` [PATCH 08/10] -mm clocksource: cleanup on -mm dwalker
2006-08-04 19:53 ` john stultz
2006-08-04 21:11 ` Daniel Walker
2006-08-04 22:16 ` john stultz
2006-08-04 23:16 ` Daniel Walker
2006-08-04 3:24 ` [PATCH 09/10] -mm clocksource: initialize list value dwalker
2006-08-04 3:24 ` [PATCH 10/10] -mm clocksource: add generic sched_clock() dwalker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-06 18:54 [PATCH 00/10] -mm: generic clocksource API -v2 Daniel Walker
2006-10-06 18:54 ` [PATCH 01/10] -mm: clocksource: increase initcall priority Daniel Walker
2006-10-07 15:40 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2006-10-07 16:51 ` Daniel Walker
2006-10-07 18:00 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2006-10-07 18:41 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2006-10-07 18:44 ` Daniel Walker
2006-10-07 19:19 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2006-10-09 18:50 ` john stultz
2006-10-09 19:24 ` Daniel Walker
2006-10-09 19:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1154716784.5327.12.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox