From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk,
herbert@13thfloor.at, hch@infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] clean up OCFS2 nlink handling
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:01:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1154725292.10109.41.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060803002038.GI29686@ca-server1.us.oracle.com>
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 17:20 -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> > - saved_nlink = inode->i_nlink;
> > - if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
> > - inode->i_nlink = 0;
> > - else
> > - inode->i_nlink--;
> > -
> > status = ocfs2_request_unlink_vote(inode, dentry,
> > (unsigned int) inode->i_nlink);
> The network request above needs to send what the new nlink will be set to.
> This is so that the other nodes which have an interest in the inode can
> determine whether the will need to do orphan processing on their last iput.
>
> Really what they do is just compare against zero and mark the inode with a
> flag indicating that it may have been orphaned. So we could just pass the
> result of inode_is_unlinkable(), but I'd rather preserve the behavior that
> we have today.
>
> The ugly method is:
>
> - status = ocfs2_request_unlink_vote(inode, dentry,
> - (unsigned int) inode->i_nlink);
> + status = ocfs2_request_unlink_vote(inode, dentry,
> + S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) && inode->i_nlink == 2 ? 0 : inode->i_nlink - 1);
>
> Better yet, we could store the result of the evaluation in a temporary
> variable and pass that through to the request function.
OK, I hope this does it.
-- Dave
OCFS2 does some operations on i_nlink, then reverts them if some
of its operations fail to complete. This does not fit in well
with the inode_drop_nlink() logic where we expect i_nlink to stay
at zero once it gets there.
So, delay all of the nlink operations until we're sure that the
operations have completed. Also, introduce a small helper to
check whether an inode has proper "unlinkable" i_nlink counts
no matter whether it is a directory or regular inode.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
---
lxc-dave/fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 50
lxc-dave/fs/ocfs2/namei.c.orig | 2268 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 2294 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/ocfs2/namei.c~Re-_PATCH_04_28_OCFS2_is_screwy fs/ocfs2/namei.c
--- lxc/fs/ocfs2/namei.c~Re-_PATCH_04_28_OCFS2_is_screwy 2006-08-04 13:53:36.000000000 -0700
+++ lxc-dave/fs/ocfs2/namei.c 2006-08-04 13:59:15.000000000 -0700
@@ -744,11 +744,23 @@ bail:
return err;
}
+static inline inode_is_unlinkable(struct inode *inode)
+{
+ if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
+ if (inode->i_nlink == 2)
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (inode->i_nlink == 1)
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int ocfs2_unlink(struct inode *dir,
struct dentry *dentry)
{
int status;
- unsigned int saved_nlink = 0;
struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(dir->i_sb);
u64 blkno;
@@ -760,6 +772,7 @@ static int ocfs2_unlink(struct inode *di
struct buffer_head *dirent_bh = NULL;
char orphan_name[OCFS2_ORPHAN_NAMELEN + 1];
struct buffer_head *orphan_entry_bh = NULL;
+ unsigned int future_nlink;
mlog_entry("(0x%p, 0x%p, '%.*s')\n", dir, dentry,
dentry->d_name.len, dentry->d_name.name);
@@ -823,18 +836,11 @@ static int ocfs2_unlink(struct inode *di
}
}
- /* There are still a few steps left until we can consider the
- * unlink to have succeeded. Save off nlink here before
- * modification so we can set it back in case we hit an issue
- * before commit. */
- saved_nlink = inode->i_nlink;
- if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
- inode->i_nlink = 0;
+ if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) && (inode->i_nlink == 2))
+ future_nlink = 0;
else
- inode->i_nlink--;
-
- status = ocfs2_request_unlink_vote(inode, dentry,
- (unsigned int) inode->i_nlink);
+ future_nlink = inode->i_nlink - 1;
+ status = ocfs2_request_unlink_vote(inode, dentry, future_nlink);
if (status < 0) {
/* This vote should succeed under all normal
* circumstances. */
@@ -842,7 +848,7 @@ static int ocfs2_unlink(struct inode *di
goto leave;
}
- if (!inode->i_nlink) {
+ if (inode_is_unlinkable(inode)) {
status = ocfs2_prepare_orphan_dir(osb, handle, inode,
orphan_name,
&orphan_entry_bh);
@@ -869,7 +875,7 @@ static int ocfs2_unlink(struct inode *di
fe = (struct ocfs2_dinode *) fe_bh->b_data;
- if (!inode->i_nlink) {
+ if (inode_is_unlinkable(inode)) {
status = ocfs2_orphan_add(osb, handle, inode, fe, orphan_name,
orphan_entry_bh);
if (status < 0) {
@@ -885,10 +891,10 @@ static int ocfs2_unlink(struct inode *di
goto leave;
}
- /* We can set nlink on the dinode now. clear the saved version
- * so that it doesn't get set later. */
+ if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
+ inode_drop_nlink(inode);
+ inode_drop_nlink(inode);
fe->i_links_count = cpu_to_le16(inode->i_nlink);
- saved_nlink = 0;
status = ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle, fe_bh);
if (status < 0) {
@@ -897,19 +903,15 @@ static int ocfs2_unlink(struct inode *di
}
if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
- dir->i_nlink--;
status = ocfs2_mark_inode_dirty(handle, dir,
parent_node_bh);
- if (status < 0) {
+ if (status < 0)
mlog_errno(status);
- inc_nlink(dir);
- }
+ else
+ inode_drop_nlink(dir);
}
leave:
- if (status < 0 && saved_nlink)
- inode->i_nlink = saved_nlink;
-
if (handle)
ocfs2_commit_trans(handle);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-04 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-01 23:52 [PATCH 00/28] Mount writer count and read-only bind mounts (v5) Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 01/28] prepare for write access checks: collapse if() Dave Hansen
2006-08-03 14:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 02/28] r/o bind mount prepwork: move open_namei()'s vfs_create() Dave Hansen
2006-08-03 14:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 03/28] unlink: monitor i_nlink Dave Hansen
2006-08-03 14:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 05/28] monitor zeroing of i_nlink Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 04/28] OCFS2 is screwy Dave Hansen
2006-08-02 2:14 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-08-02 3:19 ` [PATCH 04/28] OCFS2 is (not) screwy Dave Hansen
2006-08-02 3:21 ` [PATCH 04/28] OCFS2 is screwy Dave Hansen
2006-08-02 4:34 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-08-03 0:20 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-08-04 21:01 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2006-08-04 21:38 ` [PATCH] clean up OCFS2 nlink handling Mark Fasheh
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 06/28] reintroduce list of vfsmounts over superblock Dave Hansen
2006-08-03 14:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-04 21:47 ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 07/28] Add vfsmount writer count Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 08/28] record when sb_writer_count elevated for inode Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 09/28] kill open files traverse on remount ro Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 10/28] increment sb writer count when nlink hits zero Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 11/28] elevate writer count for chown and friends Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 12/28] elevate mnt writers for callers of vfs_mkdir() Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 14/28] sys_symlinkat() elevate write count around vfs_symlink() Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 13/28] elevate write count during entire ncp_ioctl() Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 15/28] elevate mount count for extended attributes Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 16/28] sys_linkat(): elevate write count around vfs_link() Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 18/28] unix_find_other() elevate write count for touch_atime() Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 17/28] mount_is_safe(): add comment Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 19/28] elevate write count over calls to vfs_rename() Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 20/28] tricky: elevate write count files are open()ed Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 22/28] elevate write count for do_utimes() Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 21/28] elevate writer count for do_sys_truncate() Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 23/28] elevate write count for do_sys_utime() and touch_atime() Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 24/28] sys_mknodat(): elevate write count for vfs_mknod/create() Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 26/28] do_rmdir(): elevate write count Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:52 ` [PATCH 25/28] elevate mnt writers for vfs_unlink() callers Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:53 ` [PATCH 27/28] elevate writer count for custom 'struct file' Dave Hansen
2006-08-03 14:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-11 20:31 ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-01 23:53 ` [PATCH 28/28] honor r/w changes at do_remount() time Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1154725292.10109.41.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.fasheh@oracle.com \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox