From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
alokk@calsoftinc.com
Subject: Re: [BUG] Lockdep recursive locking in kmem_cache_free
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 09:27:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1154935656.5932.262.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060802191029.GA4958@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 12:10 -0700, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
> Here's an attempt to educate lockdep about alien cache lock. tglx, can you
> confirm if this fixes the false positive? This is just an extension of the
> l3 lock lesson :).
>
> Note: With this approach, lockdep forgets its education for alien caches
> if all cpus of a node go down and come back up. But taking care of
> that scenario will make things uglier....not sure if it is worth it.
>
> Thanks,
> Kiran
Sorry, I did not come around to test it earlier. With this patch applied
the lockdep message is gone.
tglx
> Place the alien array cache locks of on slab malloc slab caches on a seperate
> lockdep class. This avoids false positives from lockdep
>
> Signed-off-by: Ravikiran Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
> Signed-off-by: Shai Fultheim <shai@scalex86.org>
>
> Index: linux-2.6.18-rc3-x460/mm/slab.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.18-rc3-x460.orig/mm/slab.c 2006-07-30 21:27:28.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.18-rc3-x460/mm/slab.c 2006-08-01 18:01:51.000000000 -0700
> @@ -682,23 +682,43 @@
> * The locking for this is tricky in that it nests within the locks
> * of all other slabs in a few places; to deal with this special
> * locking we put on-slab caches into a separate lock-class.
> + *
> + * We set lock class for alien array caches which are up during init.
> + * The lock annotation will be lost if all cpus of a node goes down and
> + * then comes back up during hotplug
> */
> -static struct lock_class_key on_slab_key;
> +static struct lock_class_key on_slab_l3_key;
> +static struct lock_class_key on_slab_alc_key;
> +
> +static inline void init_lock_keys(void)
>
> -static inline void init_lock_keys(struct cache_sizes *s)
> {
> int q;
> + struct cache_sizes *s = malloc_sizes;
>
> - for (q = 0; q < MAX_NUMNODES; q++) {
> - if (!s->cs_cachep->nodelists[q] || OFF_SLAB(s->cs_cachep))
> - continue;
> - lockdep_set_class(&s->cs_cachep->nodelists[q]->list_lock,
> - &on_slab_key);
> + while (s->cs_size != ULONG_MAX) {
> + for_each_node(q) {
> + struct array_cache **alc;
> + int r;
> + struct kmem_list3 *l3 = s->cs_cachep->nodelists[q];
> + if (!l3 || OFF_SLAB(s->cs_cachep))
> + continue;
> + lockdep_set_class(&l3->list_lock, &on_slab_l3_key);
> + alc = l3->alien;
> + if (!alc)
> + continue;
> + for_each_node(r) {
> + if (alc[r])
> + lockdep_set_class(&alc[r]->lock,
> + &on_slab_alc_key);
> + }
> + }
> + s++;
> }
> }
>
> #else
> -static inline void init_lock_keys(struct cache_sizes *s)
> +static inline void init_lock_keys()
> {
> }
> #endif
> @@ -1422,7 +1442,6 @@
> ARCH_KMALLOC_FLAGS|SLAB_PANIC,
> NULL, NULL);
> }
> - init_lock_keys(sizes);
>
> sizes->cs_dmacachep = kmem_cache_create(names->name_dma,
> sizes->cs_size,
> @@ -1495,6 +1514,10 @@
> mutex_unlock(&cache_chain_mutex);
> }
>
> + /* Annotate slab for lockdep -- annotate the malloc caches */
> + init_lock_keys();
> +
> +
> /* Done! */
> g_cpucache_up = FULL;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-07 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-27 23:56 [BUG] Lockdep recursive locking in kmem_cache_free Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-28 5:22 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-07-28 6:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-28 15:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-28 20:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-28 20:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-28 20:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-28 20:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-28 20:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-28 20:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-28 20:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-28 20:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-28 21:12 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-07-28 21:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-08-02 19:10 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-08-07 7:27 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2006-07-28 21:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-28 21:34 ` Alok Kataria
2006-07-29 4:26 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-07-28 14:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-28 17:11 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-07-28 17:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1154935656.5932.262.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alokk@calsoftinc.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=kiran@scalex86.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox