From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How to avoid serial port buffer overruns?
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:44:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1155753868.3397.41.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060816104559.GF4325@ouaza.com>
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 12:45 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> (Please CC me when replying)
>
> Hello,
>
> While using Linux on low-end (semi-embedded) hardware (386 SX 40Mhz, 8Mb
> RAM), I discovered that Linux on that machine would suffer from serial
> port buffer overruns quite easily if I use a baudrate high enough (I start
> loosing bytes at >19200 bauds and I would like to make it reliable up to
> 115 kbauds). I check if overruns are happening with
> /proc/tty/driver/serial ("oe" field).
>
> Back when I was using the 2.4 kernel, I reduced dramatically the frequency
> of overruns by using the "low latency" and "preemptible kernel" patch [1]. But
> it still happened sometimes at 115 kbauds if the system was a bit loaded
> (with disk I/O for example).
>
> Now I switched to stock 2.6 and while the stock kernel improved in
> responsiveness, it still isn't enough by default (even with
> CONFIG_PREEMPT=y and CONFIG_HZ=1000). So I wanted to try the "rt" patch of
> Ingo Molnar and Thomas Gleixner, but the patched kernel doesn't boot (see
> bug report in a separate mail on this list).
Does the serial performance seem to have regressed from 2.4 to 2.6? I
am chasing a similar issue with a serial MIDI card (supported by the bog
standard 8250 serial driver) that drops notes under 2.6 but works with
2.4. I don't have details yet, but it sounds like a similar problem.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-16 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-16 10:45 How to avoid serial port buffer overruns? Raphael Hertzog
2006-08-16 14:31 ` Lennart Sorensen
2006-08-16 14:57 ` Raphael Hertzog
2006-08-16 18:44 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2006-08-16 19:23 ` Paul Fulghum
2006-08-16 21:12 ` Lee Revell
2006-08-16 22:24 ` Paul Fulghum
2006-08-16 23:10 ` Russell King
2006-08-16 23:15 ` Lee Revell
2006-08-16 23:19 ` Russell King
2006-08-16 23:28 ` Lee Revell
2006-08-17 0:15 ` R: " Giampaolo Tomassoni
2006-08-18 8:48 ` Giampaolo Tomassoni
2006-08-18 17:00 ` Lee Revell
2006-08-18 17:04 ` Russell King
2006-08-18 17:30 ` Lee Revell
2006-08-18 18:34 ` Russell King
2006-08-18 18:52 ` Lee Revell
2006-08-18 19:01 ` Russell King
2006-08-18 19:07 ` Russell King
2006-08-18 19:09 ` Lee Revell
2006-08-17 9:20 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-17 9:28 ` Russell King
2006-08-17 11:57 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-17 13:29 ` Paul Fulghum
2006-08-17 15:48 ` Raphael Hertzog
2006-08-17 16:10 ` Raphael Hertzog
2006-08-17 16:40 ` Paul Fulghum
2006-08-18 19:31 ` Lee Revell
2006-08-23 12:45 ` Raphael Hertzog
[not found] <fa.AByCsBI8k71hMVzCyQVimrLiDU4@ifi.uio.no>
2006-08-16 14:35 ` Robert Hancock
2006-08-16 14:42 ` Erik Mouw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1155753868.3397.41.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=hertzog@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox