From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
To: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Andrey Savochkin <saw@sw.ru>,
devel@openvz.org, hugh@veritas.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>,
CKRM-Tech <ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 2/7] UBC: core (structures, API)
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:58:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1155866328.2510.247.camel@stark> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44E33BB6.3050504@sw.ru>
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 19:37 +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> Core functionality and interfaces of UBC:
> find/create beancounter, initialization,
> charge/uncharge of resource, core objects' declarations.
>
> Basic structures:
> ubparm - resource description
> user_beancounter - set of resources, id, lock
>
> Signed-Off-By: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@sw.ru>
> Signed-Off-By: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
>
> ---
> include/ub/beancounter.h | 157 ++++++++++++++++++
> init/main.c | 4
> kernel/Makefile | 1
> kernel/ub/Makefile | 7
> kernel/ub/beancounter.c | 398 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 567 insertions(+)
>
> --- /dev/null 2006-07-18 14:52:43.075228448 +0400
> +++ ./include/ub/beancounter.h 2006-08-10 14:58:27.000000000 +0400
> @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
> +/*
> + * include/ub/beancounter.h
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2006 OpenVZ. SWsoft Inc
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _LINUX_BEANCOUNTER_H
> +#define _LINUX_BEANCOUNTER_H
> +
> +/*
> + * Resource list.
> + */
> +
> +#define UB_RESOURCES 0
> +
> +struct ubparm {
> + /*
> + * A barrier over which resource allocations are failed gracefully.
> + * e.g. if the amount of consumed memory is over the barrier further
> + * sbrk() or mmap() calls fail, the existing processes are not killed.
> + */
> + unsigned long barrier;
> + /* hard resource limit */
> + unsigned long limit;
> + /* consumed resources */
> + unsigned long held;
> + /* maximum amount of consumed resources through the last period */
> + unsigned long maxheld;
> + /* minimum amount of consumed resources through the last period */
> + unsigned long minheld;
> + /* count of failed charges */
> + unsigned long failcnt;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Kernel internal part.
> + */
> +
> +#ifdef __KERNEL__
> +
> +#include <linux/config.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <asm/atomic.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * UB_MAXVALUE is essentially LONG_MAX declared in a cross-compiling safe form.
> + */
> +#define UB_MAXVALUE ( (1UL << (sizeof(unsigned long)*8-1)) - 1)
> +
> +
> +/*
> + * Resource management structures
> + * Serialization issues:
> + * beancounter list management is protected via ub_hash_lock
> + * task pointers are set only for current task and only once
> + * refcount is managed atomically
> + * value and limit comparison and change are protected by per-ub spinlock
> + */
> +
> +struct user_beancounter
> +{
> + atomic_t ub_refcount;
> + spinlock_t ub_lock;
> + uid_t ub_uid;
> + struct hlist_node hash;
> +
> + struct user_beancounter *parent;
> + void *private_data;
> +
> + /* resources statistics and settings */
> + struct ubparm ub_parms[UB_RESOURCES];
> +};
> +
> +enum severity { UB_BARRIER, UB_LIMIT, UB_FORCE };
> +
> +/* Flags passed to beancounter_findcreate() */
> +#define UB_LOOKUP_SUB 0x01 /* Lookup subbeancounter */
> +#define UB_ALLOC 0x02 /* May allocate new one */
> +#define UB_ALLOC_ATOMIC 0x04 /* Allocate with GFP_ATOMIC */
> +
> +#define UB_HASH_SIZE 256
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USER_RESOURCE
> +extern struct hlist_head ub_hash[];
> +extern spinlock_t ub_hash_lock;
> +
> +static inline void ub_adjust_held_minmax(struct user_beancounter *ub,
> + int resource)
> +{
> + if (ub->ub_parms[resource].maxheld < ub->ub_parms[resource].held)
> + ub->ub_parms[resource].maxheld = ub->ub_parms[resource].held;
> + if (ub->ub_parms[resource].minheld > ub->ub_parms[resource].held)
> + ub->ub_parms[resource].minheld = ub->ub_parms[resource].held;
> +}
> +
> +void ub_print_resource_warning(struct user_beancounter *ub, int res,
> + char *str, unsigned long val, unsigned long held);
> +void ub_print_uid(struct user_beancounter *ub, char *str, int size);
> +
> +int __charge_beancounter_locked(struct user_beancounter *ub,
> + int resource, unsigned long val, enum severity strict);
> +void charge_beancounter_notop(struct user_beancounter *ub,
> + int resource, unsigned long val);
> +int charge_beancounter(struct user_beancounter *ub,
> + int resource, unsigned long val, enum severity strict);
> +
> +void __uncharge_beancounter_locked(struct user_beancounter *ub,
> + int resource, unsigned long val);
> +void uncharge_beancounter_notop(struct user_beancounter *ub,
> + int resource, unsigned long val);
> +void uncharge_beancounter(struct user_beancounter *ub,
> + int resource, unsigned long val);
> +
> +struct user_beancounter *beancounter_findcreate(uid_t uid,
> + struct user_beancounter *parent, int flags);
> +
> +static inline struct user_beancounter *get_beancounter(
> + struct user_beancounter *ub)
> +{
> + atomic_inc(&ub->ub_refcount);
> + return ub;
> +}
> +
> +void __put_beancounter(struct user_beancounter *ub);
> +static inline void put_beancounter(struct user_beancounter *ub)
> +{
> + __put_beancounter(ub);
> +}
> +
> +void ub_init_early(void);
> +void ub_init_late(void);
> +void ub_init_proc(void);
> +
> +extern struct user_beancounter ub0;
> +extern const char *ub_rnames[];
> +
> +#else /* CONFIG_USER_RESOURCE */
> +
> +#define beancounter_findcreate(id, p, f) (NULL)
> +#define get_beancounter(ub) (NULL)
> +#define put_beancounter(ub) do { } while (0)
> +#define __charge_beancounter_locked(ub, r, v, s) (0)
> +#define charge_beancounter(ub, r, v, s) (0)
> +#define charge_beancounter_notop(ub, r, v) do { } while (0)
> +#define __uncharge_beancounter_locked(ub, r, v) do { } while (0)
> +#define uncharge_beancounter(ub, r, v) do { } while (0)
> +#define uncharge_beancounter_notop(ub, r, v) do { } while (0)
> +#define ub_init_early() do { } while (0)
> +#define ub_init_late() do { } while (0)
> +#define ub_init_proc() do { } while (0)
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_USER_RESOURCE */
> +#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> +
> +#endif /* _LINUX_BEANCOUNTER_H */
> --- ./init/main.c.ubcore 2006-08-10 14:55:47.000000000 +0400
> +++ ./init/main.c 2006-08-10 14:57:01.000000000 +0400
> @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@
> #include <linux/debug_locks.h>
> #include <linux/lockdep.h>
>
> +#include <ub/beancounter.h>
> +
> #include <asm/io.h>
> #include <asm/bugs.h>
> #include <asm/setup.h>
> @@ -470,6 +472,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
> early_boot_irqs_off();
> early_init_irq_lock_class();
>
> + ub_init_early();
> /*
> * Interrupts are still disabled. Do necessary setups, then
> * enable them
> @@ -563,6 +566,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
> #endif
> fork_init(num_physpages);
> proc_caches_init();
> + ub_init_late();
> buffer_init();
> unnamed_dev_init();
> key_init();
> --- ./kernel/Makefile.ubcore 2006-08-10 14:55:47.000000000 +0400
> +++ ./kernel/Makefile 2006-08-10 14:57:01.000000000 +0400
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ obj-y = sched.o fork.o exec_domain.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_STACKTRACE) += stacktrace.o
> obj-y += time/
> +obj-y += ub/
> obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES) += mutex-debug.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) += lockdep.o
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_PROC_FS),y)
> --- /dev/null 2006-07-18 14:52:43.075228448 +0400
> +++ ./kernel/ub/Makefile 2006-08-10 14:57:01.000000000 +0400
> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> +#
> +# User resources part (UBC)
> +#
> +# Copyright (C) 2006 OpenVZ. SWsoft Inc
> +#
> +
> +obj-$(CONFIG_USER_RESOURCE) += beancounter.o
> --- /dev/null 2006-07-18 14:52:43.075228448 +0400
> +++ ./kernel/ub/beancounter.c 2006-08-10 15:09:34.000000000 +0400
> @@ -0,0 +1,398 @@
> +/*
> + * kernel/ub/beancounter.c
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2006 OpenVZ. SWsoft Inc
> + * Original code by (C) 1998 Alan Cox
> + * 1998-2000 Andrey Savochkin <saw@saw.sw.com.sg>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +
> +#include <ub/beancounter.h>
> +
> +static kmem_cache_t *ub_cachep;
> +static struct user_beancounter default_beancounter;
> +static struct user_beancounter default_subbeancounter;
> +
> +static void init_beancounter_struct(struct user_beancounter *ub, uid_t id);
> +
> +struct user_beancounter ub0;
> +
> +const char *ub_rnames[] = {
> +};
> +
> +#define ub_hash_fun(x) ((((x) >> 8) ^ (x)) & (UB_HASH_SIZE - 1))
> +#define ub_subhash_fun(p, id) ub_hash_fun((p)->ub_uid + (id) * 17)
> +
> +struct hlist_head ub_hash[UB_HASH_SIZE];
> +spinlock_t ub_hash_lock;
> +
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ub_hash);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ub_hash_lock);
> +
> +/*
> + * Per user resource beancounting. Resources are tied to their luid.
You haven't explained what an luid is at this point in the patch series.
Patch 0 says:
diff-ubc-syscalls.patch:
Patch adds system calls for UB management:
1. sys_getluid - get current UB id
But I have no idea what that l is there for. Why not sys_get_ubid() for
instance?
> + * The resource structure itself is tagged both to the process and
> + * the charging resources (a socket doesn't want to have to search for
> + * things at irq time for example). Reference counters keep things in
> + * hand.
> + *
> + * The case where a user creates resource, kills all his processes and
> + * then starts new ones is correctly handled this way. The refcounters
> + * will mean the old entry is still around with resource tied to it.
> + */
> +
So we create one beancounter object for every resource the user's tasks
allocate? For instance, one per socket? Or does "resource structure"
refer to something else?
> +struct user_beancounter *beancounter_findcreate(uid_t uid,
> + struct user_beancounter *p, int mask)
> +{
> + struct user_beancounter *new_ub, *ub, *tmpl_ub;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct hlist_head *slot;
> + struct hlist_node *pos;
> +
> + if (mask & UB_LOOKUP_SUB) {
> + WARN_ON(p == NULL);
> + tmpl_ub = &default_subbeancounter;
> + slot = &ub_hash[ub_subhash_fun(p, uid)];
> + } else {
> + WARN_ON(p != NULL);
> + tmpl_ub = &default_beancounter;
> + slot = &ub_hash[ub_hash_fun(uid)];
> + }
> + new_ub = NULL;
> +
> +retry:
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ub_hash_lock, flags);
> + hlist_for_each_entry (ub, pos, slot, hash)
> + if (ub->ub_uid == uid && ub->parent == p)
> + break;
> +
> + if (pos != NULL) {
> + get_beancounter(ub);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ub_hash_lock, flags);
> +
> + if (new_ub != NULL) {
> + put_beancounter(new_ub->parent);
> + kmem_cache_free(ub_cachep, new_ub);
> + }
> + return ub;
> + }
> +
> + if (!(mask & UB_ALLOC))
> + goto out_unlock;
> +
> + if (new_ub != NULL)
> + goto out_install;
> +
> + if (mask & UB_ALLOC_ATOMIC) {
This block..
> + new_ub = kmem_cache_alloc(ub_cachep, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (new_ub == NULL)
> + goto out_unlock;
> +
> + memcpy(new_ub, tmpl_ub, sizeof(*new_ub));
> + init_beancounter_struct(new_ub, uid);
> + if (p)
> + new_ub->parent = get_beancounter(p);
ending here is almost exactly the same as the block ..
> + goto out_install;
> + }
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ub_hash_lock, flags);
> +
>From here..
> + new_ub = kmem_cache_alloc(ub_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (new_ub == NULL)
> + goto out;
> +
> + memcpy(new_ub, tmpl_ub, sizeof(*new_ub));
> + init_beancounter_struct(new_ub, uid);
> + if (p)
> + new_ub->parent = get_beancounter(p);
to here. You could make a flag variable that holds GFP_ATOMIC or
GFP_KERNEL based on mask & UB_ALLOC_ATOMIC and perhaps turn this block
into a small helper.
> + goto retry;
> +
> +out_install:
> + hlist_add_head(&new_ub->hash, slot);
> +out_unlock:
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ub_hash_lock, flags);
> +out:
> + return new_ub;
> +}
> +
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(beancounter_findcreate);
> +
> +void ub_print_uid(struct user_beancounter *ub, char *str, int size)
> +{
> + if (ub->parent != NULL)
> + snprintf(str, size, "%u.%u", ub->parent->ub_uid, ub->ub_uid);
> + else
> + snprintf(str, size, "%u", ub->ub_uid);
> +}
> +
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ub_print_uid);
>From what I can see this patch doesn't really justify the need for the
EXPORT_SYMBOL. Shouldn't that be done in the patch where it's needed
outside of the kernel/ub code itself?
> +void ub_print_resource_warning(struct user_beancounter *ub, int res,
> + char *str, unsigned long val, unsigned long held)
> +{
> + char uid[64];
> +
> + ub_print_uid(ub, uid, sizeof(uid));
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "UB %s %s warning: %s "
> + "(held %lu, fails %lu, val %lu)\n",
> + uid, ub_rnames[res], str,
> + (res < UB_RESOURCES ? ub->ub_parms[res].held : held),
> + (res < UB_RESOURCES ? ub->ub_parms[res].failcnt : 0),
> + val);
> +}
> +
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ub_print_resource_warning);
> +
> +static inline void verify_held(struct user_beancounter *ub)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < UB_RESOURCES; i++)
> + if (ub->ub_parms[i].held != 0)
> + ub_print_resource_warning(ub, i,
> + "resource is held on put", 0, 0);
> +}
> +
> +void __put_beancounter(struct user_beancounter *ub)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct user_beancounter *parent;
> +
> +again:
> + parent = ub->parent;
> + /* equevalent to atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave() */
nit: s/que/qui/
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> + if (likely(!atomic_dec_and_lock(&ub->ub_refcount, &ub_hash_lock))) {
> + if (unlikely(atomic_read(&ub->ub_refcount) < 0))
> + printk(KERN_ERR "UB: Bad ub refcount: ub=%p, "
> + "luid=%d, ref=%d\n",
> + ub, ub->ub_uid,
> + atomic_read(&ub->ub_refcount));
This seems to be for debugging purposes only. If not, perhaps this
printk ought to be rate limited?
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (unlikely(ub == &ub0)) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "Trying to put ub0\n");
Same thing for this printk.
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ub_hash_lock, flags);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + verify_held(ub);
> + hlist_del(&ub->hash);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ub_hash_lock, flags);
> +
> + kmem_cache_free(ub_cachep, ub);
> +
> + ub = parent;
> + if (ub != NULL)
> + goto again;
Couldn't this be replaced by a do { } while (ub != NULL); loop?
> +}
> +
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__put_beancounter);
> +
> +/*
> + * Generic resource charging stuff
> + */
> +
> +int __charge_beancounter_locked(struct user_beancounter *ub,
> + int resource, unsigned long val, enum severity strict)
> +{
> + /*
> + * ub_value <= UB_MAXVALUE, value <= UB_MAXVALUE, and only one addition
> + * at the moment is possible so an overflow is impossible.
> + */
> + ub->ub_parms[resource].held += val;
> +
> + switch (strict) {
> + case UB_BARRIER:
> + if (ub->ub_parms[resource].held >
> + ub->ub_parms[resource].barrier)
> + break;
> + /* fallthrough */
> + case UB_LIMIT:
> + if (ub->ub_parms[resource].held >
> + ub->ub_parms[resource].limit)
> + break;
> + /* fallthrough */
> + case UB_FORCE:
> + ub_adjust_held_minmax(ub, resource);
> + return 0;
> + default:
> + BUG();
> + }
> +
> + ub->ub_parms[resource].failcnt++;
> + ub->ub_parms[resource].held -= val;
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +}
> +
> +int charge_beancounter(struct user_beancounter *ub,
> + int resource, unsigned long val, enum severity strict)
> +{
> + int retval;
> + struct user_beancounter *p, *q;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + retval = -EINVAL;
> + BUG_ON(val > UB_MAXVALUE);
> +
> + local_irq_save(flags);
<factor>
> + for (p = ub; p != NULL; p = p->parent) {
Seems rather expensive to walk up the tree for every charge. Especially
if the administrator wants a fine degree of resource control and makes a
tall tree. This would be a problem especially when it comes to resources
that require frequent and fast allocation.
> + spin_lock(&p->ub_lock);
> + retval = __charge_beancounter_locked(p, resource, val, strict);
> + spin_unlock(&p->ub_lock);
> + if (retval)
> + goto unroll;
This can be factored by passing a flag that breaks the loop on an error:
if (retval && do_break_err)
return retval;
> + }
</factor>
> +out_restore:
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> + return retval;
> +
<factor>
> +unroll:
> + for (q = ub; q != p; q = q->parent) {
> + spin_lock(&q->ub_lock);
> + __uncharge_beancounter_locked(q, resource, val);
> + spin_unlock(&q->ub_lock);
> + }
</factor>
> + goto out_restore;
> +}
> +
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(charge_beancounter);
> +
> +void charge_beancounter_notop(struct user_beancounter *ub,
> + int resource, unsigned long val)
> +{
> + struct user_beancounter *p;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + local_irq_save(flags);
<factor>
> + for (p = ub; p->parent != NULL; p = p->parent) {
> + spin_lock(&p->ub_lock);
> + __charge_beancounter_locked(p, resource, val, UB_FORCE);
> + spin_unlock(&p->ub_lock);
> + }
<factor>
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
Again, this could be factored with charge_beancounter using a helper
function.
> +}
> +
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(charge_beancounter_notop);
> +
> +void __uncharge_beancounter_locked(struct user_beancounter *ub,
> + int resource, unsigned long val)
> +{
> + if (unlikely(ub->ub_parms[resource].held < val)) {
> + ub_print_resource_warning(ub, resource,
> + "uncharging too much", val, 0);
> + val = ub->ub_parms[resource].held;
> + }
> + ub->ub_parms[resource].held -= val;
> + ub_adjust_held_minmax(ub, resource);
> +}
> +
> +void uncharge_beancounter(struct user_beancounter *ub,
> + int resource, unsigned long val)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct user_beancounter *p;
> +
> + for (p = ub; p != NULL; p = p->parent) {
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&p->ub_lock, flags);
> + __uncharge_beancounter_locked(p, resource, val);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->ub_lock, flags);
> + }
> +}
Looks like your unroll: label in charge_beancounter above.
> +
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(uncharge_beancounter);
> +
> +void uncharge_beancounter_notop(struct user_beancounter *ub,
> + int resource, unsigned long val)
> +{
> + struct user_beancounter *p;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + local_irq_save(flags);
<factor>
> + for (p = ub; p->parent != NULL; p = p->parent) {
> + spin_lock(&p->ub_lock);
> + __uncharge_beancounter_locked(p, resource, val);
> + spin_unlock(&p->ub_lock);
> + }
</factor>
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> +}
> +
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(uncharge_beancounter_notop);
> +
> +/*
> + * Initialization
> + *
> + * struct user_beancounter contains
> + * - limits and other configuration settings
> + * - structural fields: lists, spinlocks and so on.
> + *
> + * Before these parts are initialized, the structure should be memset
> + * to 0 or copied from a known clean structure. That takes care of a lot
> + * of fields not initialized explicitly.
> + */
> +
> +static void init_beancounter_struct(struct user_beancounter *ub, uid_t id)
> +{
> + atomic_set(&ub->ub_refcount, 1);
> + spin_lock_init(&ub->ub_lock);
> + ub->ub_uid = id;
> +}
> +
> +static void init_beancounter_nolimits(struct user_beancounter *ub)
> +{
> + int k;
> +
> + for (k = 0; k < UB_RESOURCES; k++) {
> + ub->ub_parms[k].limit = UB_MAXVALUE;
> + ub->ub_parms[k].barrier = UB_MAXVALUE;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void init_beancounter_syslimits(struct user_beancounter *ub)
> +{
> + int k;
> +
> + for (k = 0; k < UB_RESOURCES; k++)
> + ub->ub_parms[k].barrier = ub->ub_parms[k].limit;
> +}
> +
> +void __init ub_init_early(void)
> +{
> + struct user_beancounter *ub;
> + struct hlist_head *slot;
> +
> + ub = &ub0;
> +
<factor>
> + memset(ub, 0, sizeof(*ub));
> + init_beancounter_nolimits(ub);
> + init_beancounter_struct(ub, 0);
> +
</factor>
> + spin_lock_init(&ub_hash_lock);
> + slot = &ub_hash[ub_hash_fun(ub->ub_uid)];
> + hlist_add_head(&ub->hash, slot);
> +}
> +
> +void __init ub_init_late(void)
> +{
> + struct user_beancounter *ub;
> +
> + ub_cachep = kmem_cache_create("user_beancounters",
> + sizeof(struct user_beancounter),
> + 0, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, NULL, NULL);
> + if (ub_cachep == NULL)
> + panic("Can't create ubc caches\n");
> +
> + ub = &default_beancounter;
<factor>
> + memset(ub, 0, sizeof(default_beancounter));
> + init_beancounter_syslimits(ub);
> + init_beancounter_struct(ub, 0);
> +
</factor>
> + ub = &default_subbeancounter;
<factor>
> + memset(ub, 0, sizeof(default_subbeancounter));
> + init_beancounter_nolimits(ub);
> + init_beancounter_struct(ub, 0);
</factor>
> +}
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-18 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 209+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-16 15:24 [RFC][PATCH] UBC: user resource beancounters Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-16 15:35 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] UBC: kconfig Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-18 19:57 ` [ckrm-tech] " Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-18 21:14 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-25 15:12 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-16 15:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] UBC: core (structures, API) Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-16 16:58 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-17 11:42 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-16 17:15 ` Greg KH
2006-08-17 11:45 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-17 12:14 ` Greg KH
2006-08-17 14:32 ` [ckrm-tech] " Dave Hansen
2006-08-18 12:36 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-16 18:11 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-16 18:18 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-17 11:54 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-17 11:53 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-17 16:55 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-18 11:14 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-18 17:51 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-18 5:31 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-18 7:35 ` [PATCH " Andrey Savochkin
2006-08-18 8:26 ` [ckrm-tech] " Matt Helsley
2006-08-18 11:52 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-18 15:59 ` [RFC][PATCH " Alan Cox
2006-08-17 11:09 ` [ckrm-tech] " Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-17 14:02 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-17 18:59 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-18 1:58 ` Matt Helsley [this message]
2006-08-18 11:36 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-19 2:38 ` Matt Helsley
2006-08-21 11:02 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-22 12:23 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-22 12:46 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-22 14:38 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-21 17:35 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-20 4:58 ` Balbir Singh
2006-08-20 5:01 ` Balbir Singh
2006-08-16 15:38 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] UBC: ub context and inheritance Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-16 16:51 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-17 11:09 ` [ckrm-tech] " Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-17 13:21 ` [Devel] " Pavel V. Emelianov
2006-08-18 2:42 ` Matt Helsley
2006-08-18 9:23 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-19 2:19 ` Matt Helsley
2006-08-18 20:03 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-21 10:32 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-21 20:48 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-16 15:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] UBC: syscalls (user interface) Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-16 16:52 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-16 17:17 ` Greg KH
2006-08-17 12:02 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-16 18:17 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-16 19:04 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-16 19:22 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-17 12:13 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-17 15:40 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-18 8:08 ` [PATCH " Andrey Savochkin
2006-08-18 14:45 ` [ckrm-tech] " Dave Hansen
2006-08-18 16:42 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-18 17:29 ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-18 17:38 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-18 17:59 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-18 18:18 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-21 2:42 ` Magnus Damm
2006-08-18 18:09 ` Paul Jackson
2006-08-18 18:17 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-18 18:27 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-18 18:56 ` Paul Jackson
2006-08-18 19:16 ` Chris Friesen
2006-08-18 21:19 ` Paul Jackson
2006-08-18 19:48 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-18 21:16 ` Paul Jackson
2006-08-21 2:38 ` Magnus Damm
2006-08-21 7:48 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-21 8:42 ` Magnus Damm
2006-08-21 9:03 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-21 9:18 ` Magnus Damm
2006-08-21 13:35 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-21 17:51 ` Paul Jackson
2006-08-22 8:52 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-21 2:47 ` Magnus Damm
2006-08-22 1:16 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-22 3:58 ` Magnus Damm
2006-08-22 18:34 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-24 1:20 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-18 11:05 ` [RFC][PATCH " Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-17 17:08 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-17 12:04 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-17 17:05 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-17 11:09 ` [ckrm-tech] " Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-17 14:04 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-17 16:19 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-18 2:31 ` Matt Helsley
2006-08-18 11:45 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-19 2:43 ` Matt Helsley
2006-08-18 11:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-08-18 20:13 ` [ckrm-tech] " Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-16 15:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] UBC: kernel memory accounting (core) Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-16 16:56 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-17 13:47 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-16 18:24 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-17 13:27 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-17 14:38 ` [ckrm-tech] " Dave Hansen
2006-08-18 9:31 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-18 14:58 ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-21 10:40 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-21 15:10 ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-18 15:06 ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-21 12:38 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-17 17:02 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-18 9:38 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-18 16:55 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-21 10:43 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-22 1:23 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-16 18:47 ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-16 19:15 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-16 19:59 ` [ckrm-tech] " Dave Hansen
2006-08-17 0:24 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-17 14:26 ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-17 15:01 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-17 16:04 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-18 10:54 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-17 16:37 ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-17 15:19 ` Rik van Riel
2006-08-17 17:28 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-17 18:43 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-17 17:49 ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-18 8:29 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-18 17:06 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-17 17:16 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-17 17:23 ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-17 17:36 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-17 17:53 ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-18 8:54 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-18 14:52 ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-18 17:38 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-21 11:29 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-22 1:48 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-22 7:43 ` Pavel V. Emelianov
2006-08-18 8:51 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-18 8:52 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-18 14:59 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-18 19:32 ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-18 20:52 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-21 9:44 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-17 16:42 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-17 16:31 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-17 0:22 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-17 16:36 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-18 8:44 ` [ckrm-tech] " Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-17 13:35 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-17 17:13 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-18 8:49 ` [ckrm-tech] " Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-17 13:31 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-17 14:36 ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-18 8:12 ` [ckrm-tech] " Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-18 14:43 ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-21 8:57 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-18 20:26 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-21 10:51 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-21 20:55 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-16 15:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] UBC: kernel memory acconting (mark objects) Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-16 16:57 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-16 15:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] UBC: proc interface Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-16 17:13 ` Greg KH
2006-08-17 13:43 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-17 15:40 ` Greg KH
2006-08-17 16:12 ` [Devel] " Kir Kolyshkin
2006-08-16 18:53 ` [RFC][PATCH] UBC: user resource beancounters Rohit Seth
2006-08-16 19:26 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-17 0:15 ` [ckrm-tech] " Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-17 11:02 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-08-17 13:55 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-17 19:55 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-18 10:36 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-18 18:53 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-18 22:55 ` Matt Helsley
2006-08-21 10:55 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-21 21:04 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-18 19:39 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-21 13:24 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-21 21:45 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-21 22:20 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-21 22:44 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-22 1:45 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-22 10:02 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-22 9:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-22 11:15 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-24 1:31 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-22 18:55 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-24 1:44 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-24 2:04 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-24 11:10 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-24 23:48 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-24 23:55 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-08-25 18:21 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-25 20:46 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-25 21:37 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-25 22:51 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-25 22:59 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-24 17:27 ` Rohit Seth
2006-08-24 23:52 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-25 11:12 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-25 18:47 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-25 20:52 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-25 22:23 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-08-25 23:12 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-25 23:00 ` Chandra Seetharaman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1155866328.2510.247.camel@stark \
--to=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=dev@sw.ru \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=saw@sw.ru \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox