Re: [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v2)

Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-28T08:25:53Z

Andi Kleen wrote:
>>D) Virtual scan of mm's in the over-limit container
>>
>>E) Modify existing physical scanner to be able to skip pages which
>> belong to not-over-limit containers.
>
>
> The same applies to dentries/inodes too, doesn't it? But their
> scan is already virtual so their LRUs could be just split into
> a per container list (but then didn't Christoph L. plan to
> rewrite that code anyways?)
how do you propose to handle shared files in this case?

> For memory my guess would be that (E) would be easier than (D) for user/file
> memory though less efficient.

Kirill