From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] dubious process system time.
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:29:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1156501768.1640.19.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44EECCF9.7080902@aitel.hist.no>
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 12:12 +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
> > Again, why do I have to account non-process related time to a process?
> > Ihmo that is completly wrong.
> >
> If softirq time have to be accounted to a process (so as to not
> get lost), how about accounting it to the softirqd process? Much
> more reasonable than random processes.
The main question still is if it is correct to add softirq/hardirq time
to the system time of a process. If the answer turns out to be yes, then
it might be a clever idea to account softirq time to the softirqd. That
still leaves the question what to do with hardirq time ..
My take still is that softirq/hardirq time does not belong to the system
time of any process.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
Martin Schwidefsky
Linux for zSeries Development & Services
IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-25 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-24 12:18 [patch] dubious process system time Martin Schwidefsky
2006-08-24 12:32 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-24 13:28 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-08-24 15:18 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-24 16:02 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-08-25 10:12 ` Helge Hafting
2006-08-25 10:29 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2006-08-25 12:58 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-08-24 23:40 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-08-25 8:18 ` Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1156501768.1640.19.camel@localhost \
--to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox