* hrtimers -- high-resolution clock subsystem
@ 2006-09-05 15:07 Bernhard Walle
2006-09-06 7:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bernhard Walle @ 2006-09-05 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar
Hello,
,----[ Documentation/hrtimers.txt]--
| We used the high-resolution clock subsystem ontop of hrtimers to
| verify the hrtimer implementation details in praxis
`----
I didn't find any "high-resolution clock subsystem" in the internet as
patch. Can you give me the point or did I got this sentence wrong?
Thanks.
BTW: There's a typo in this text, patch below. And I hope the patch is
correct. Or would an extra email for this be better?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed typo in hrtimers documentation.
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bernhard.walle@gmx.de>
---
hrtimers.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- Documentation/hrtimers.txt.orig 2006-09-05 16:53:51.000000000 +0200
+++ Documentation/hrtimers.txt 2006-09-05 16:54:48.000000000 +0200
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@
----------------------------------
We used the high-resolution clock subsystem ontop of hrtimers to verify
-the hrtimer implementation details in praxis, and we also ran the posix
+the hrtimer implementation details in practise, and we also ran the posix
timer tests in order to ensure specification compliance. We also ran
tests on low-resolution clocks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: hrtimers -- high-resolution clock subsystem
2006-09-05 15:07 hrtimers -- high-resolution clock subsystem Bernhard Walle
@ 2006-09-06 7:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-09-06 10:57 ` Bernhard Walle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2006-09-06 7:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bernhard Walle; +Cc: linux-kernel, Ingo Molnar
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 17:07 +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ,----[ Documentation/hrtimers.txt]--
> | We used the high-resolution clock subsystem ontop of hrtimers to
> | verify the hrtimer implementation details in praxis
> `----
>
> I didn't find any "high-resolution clock subsystem" in the internet as
> patch. Can you give me the point or did I got this sentence wrong?
> Thanks.
http://www.tglx.de/projects/hrtimers
> BTW: There's a typo in this text, patch below. And I hope the patch is
> correct. Or would an extra email for this be better?
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Fixed typo in hrtimers documentation.
Thanks
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: hrtimers -- high-resolution clock subsystem
2006-09-06 7:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2006-09-06 10:57 ` Bernhard Walle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bernhard Walle @ 2006-09-06 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, linux-kernel
Hello,
* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> [2006-09-06 09:14]:
> On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 17:07 +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> >
> > ,----[ Documentation/hrtimers.txt]--
> > | We used the high-resolution clock subsystem ontop of hrtimers to
> > | verify the hrtimer implementation details in praxis
> > `----
> >
> > I didn't find any "high-resolution clock subsystem" in the internet as
> > patch. Can you give me the point or did I got this sentence wrong?
> > Thanks.
>
> http://www.tglx.de/projects/hrtimers
Ah, sorry, I saw this site but I thought the patches are outdated
because new kernels already include hrtimers. I was wrong and I
applied the patches and it works. :)
Regards,
Bernhard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-09-06 10:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-09-05 15:07 hrtimers -- high-resolution clock subsystem Bernhard Walle
2006-09-06 7:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-09-06 10:57 ` Bernhard Walle
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox