From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750825AbWIHHyk (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Sep 2006 03:54:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750826AbWIHHyk (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Sep 2006 03:54:40 -0400 Received: from amsfep17-int.chello.nl ([213.46.243.15]:50143 "EHLO amsfep19-int.chello.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750825AbWIHHyk (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Sep 2006 03:54:40 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] Split the free lists into kernel and user parts From: Peter Zijlstra To: Mel Gorman Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060907190422.6166.49758.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> References: <20060907190342.6166.49732.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> <20060907190422.6166.49758.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 09:54:00 +0200 Message-Id: <1157702040.17799.40.camel@lappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mel, Looking good, some small nits follow. On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 20:04 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > +#define for_each_rclmtype_order(type, order) \ > + for (order = 0; order < MAX_ORDER; order++) \ > + for (type = 0; type < RCLM_TYPES; type++) It seems odd to me that you have the for loops in reverse order of the arguments. > +static inline int get_pageblock_type(struct page *page) > +{ > + return (PageEasyRclm(page) != 0); > +} I find the naming a little odd, I would have suspected something like: get_page_blocktype() or thereabout since you're getting a page attribute. > +static inline int gfpflags_to_rclmtype(unsigned long gfp_flags) > +{ > + return ((gfp_flags & __GFP_EASYRCLM) != 0); > +} gfp_t argument?