From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.16.30-pre1
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 16:57:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1159045077.1097.182.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060923224909.69579243.khali@linux-fr.org>
On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 22:49 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> I will not use 2.6.16.y with its current rules, for sure, and I doubt
> any distribution will. Wasn't the whole point of 2.6.16.y to serve as
> a common base between several distributions?
I would not expect distros to be interested in a 2.6 tree that does not
add support for new devices. Isn't new hardware support one of the main
areas where distros routinely get ahead of mainline?
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-23 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-22 22:23 Linux 2.6.16.30-pre1 Adrian Bunk
2006-09-22 22:38 ` Greg KH
2006-09-22 22:47 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-22 23:09 ` Greg KH
2006-09-23 4:56 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-09-23 23:21 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-23 23:53 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-09-24 7:46 ` Sergey Vlasov
2006-09-24 18:16 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-24 19:46 ` Stefan Richter
2006-09-24 19:44 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-09-24 20:02 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-09-25 1:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-24 10:17 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-25 1:23 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-25 8:15 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-27 5:14 ` Greg KH
2006-09-23 20:49 ` Jean Delvare
2006-09-23 20:57 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2006-09-23 21:20 ` Jean Delvare
2006-09-23 22:47 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-23 22:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-23 22:47 ` Lee Revell
2006-09-23 22:58 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-23 22:12 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-24 10:12 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-25 1:20 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-24 20:25 ` Grant Coady
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1159045077.1097.182.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox