From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>,
Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Subject: debugfs oddity
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 11:25:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1159781104.2655.47.camel@ux156> (raw)
Recently, I observed (in bcm43xx) that debugfs seems to keep things
alive when userspace still has a directory open. Consider the following
sequence of events:
(a) kernel code creates a directory in debugfs
(b) user changes current directory to that
(c) kernel code removes that directory in debugfs
Now, consider the equivalent sequence in a regular filesystem (or
tmpfs):
(a') user creates directory
(b') user cd's into it
(c') user deletes directory from a different shell
The same thing should happen, in both cases the directory is kept around
in a way until the process that has the current dir in the dead
directory gives it up.
Now, however, consider
(d') user creates directory with the same name
This works fine, and the old process sees nothing that happens in the
new directory, as expected. However,
(d) kernel code tries to create a debugfs directory with the same name
does not work at all.
Is this expected behaviour? It seems that once a driver requested that a
directory is removed it can rightfully expect to be able to recreate it
afterwards even if there's still the need to keep it lingering around
for a bit.
Similar things can probably happen when attributes are kept open, but I
haven't tested this. I have also not tested sysfs or configfs.
johannes
next reply other threads:[~2006-10-02 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-02 9:25 Johannes Berg [this message]
2006-10-03 5:28 ` debugfs oddity Greg KH
2006-10-04 7:20 ` Johannes Berg
2006-10-04 8:12 ` Greg KH
2006-10-04 8:23 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1159781104.2655.47.camel@ux156 \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=Joel.Becker@oracle.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox