From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org>,
Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Spam, bogofilter, etc
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 18:49:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1159811392.8907.36.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610020933020.3952@g5.osdl.org>
Ar Llu, 2006-10-02 am 09:40 -0700, ysgrifennodd Linus Torvalds:
> If you want a yes/no kind of thing, do it on real hard issues, like not
> accepting email from machines that aren't registered MX gateways. Sure,
> that will mean that people who just set up their local sendmail thing and
> connect directly to port 25 will just not be able to email, but let's face
> it, that's why we have ISP's and DNS in the first place.
Except most of the ISPs are incompetent and many people have to run
their own mail system in order to get mail that actually *works*. I've
had that experience several times, although thankfully I now have a sane
ISP.
MX checking is as broken or more broken than bayes.
There is another reason bayes is not very good too - every good spammer
reruns their message through spamassassin adding random text till they
get a good score *then* they spew it out.
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-02 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-29 14:23 Spam, bogofilter, etc Lee Revell
2006-09-29 14:29 ` Ismail Donmez
2006-10-01 23:23 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-10-02 0:41 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-10-02 10:03 ` Matti Aarnio
2006-10-02 15:21 ` Lee Revell
2006-10-02 15:24 ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-10-02 15:48 ` Lee Revell
2006-10-02 17:39 ` Erik Andersen
2006-10-03 3:37 ` dean gaudet
2006-10-03 4:05 ` Neil Brown
2006-10-02 16:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-02 17:49 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2006-10-02 17:19 ` David Lang
2006-10-02 18:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-02 18:07 ` Martin Bligh
2006-10-02 18:22 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-10-02 18:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-02 19:31 ` jdow
2006-10-02 19:31 ` Antonio Vargas
2006-10-02 21:58 ` Alan Cox
2006-10-04 22:41 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-10-03 17:32 ` Mariusz Kozlowski
2006-10-02 21:33 ` Horst H. von Brand
2006-10-03 8:08 ` John Graham-Cumming
2006-10-03 8:52 ` Howard Chu
2006-10-03 9:40 ` Devdas Bhagat
2006-10-03 9:43 ` Helge Hafting
2006-10-03 10:50 ` Gordon Cormack
2006-10-02 17:34 ` Thomas Davis
2006-10-03 16:42 ` Mariusz Kozlowski
2006-10-27 22:30 ` Oleg Verych
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-03 6:08 Paul Zimmerman
2006-10-03 12:51 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
[not found] <20061003060346.55869.qmail@web80821.mail.yahoo.com>
2006-10-03 7:01 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1159811392.8907.36.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matti.aarnio@zmailer.org \
--cc=mbligh@mbligh.org \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox