From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030752AbWJDIW2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Oct 2006 04:22:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030754AbWJDIW2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Oct 2006 04:22:28 -0400 Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:27843 "EHLO sipsolutions.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030753AbWJDIW1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Oct 2006 04:22:27 -0400 Subject: Re: debugfs oddity From: Johannes Berg To: Greg KH Cc: Takashi Iwai , linux-kernel , Joel Becker , Michael Buesch In-Reply-To: <20061004081213.GA3477@suse.de> References: <1159781104.2655.47.camel@ux156> <20061003052839.GA18989@suse.de> <1159946446.2817.2.camel@ux156> <20061004081213.GA3477@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 10:23:19 +0200 Message-Id: <1159950200.2817.34.camel@ux156> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.7.92 X-sips-origin: local Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 01:12 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > I don't understand. Does ramfs have the same issues you feel debugfs > has? Or does it work like a disk based file system? It works like tmpfs and disk based filesystems and allows re-creating a removed directory. johannes