From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, johnstul@us.ibm.com, mingo@elte.hu,
zippel@linux-m68k.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 00:53:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1160348036.5686.155.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1160345593.3693.180.camel@c-67-180-230-165.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 15:13 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 23:38 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> >
> > I don't see that behaviour on my machines and nobody complains about
> > that. I don't care about stale comments. Point me to a bug report
> > instead of your perception of what's optimal and not.
>
> Let both do this. Lets discuss empirical behavior. Otherwise we aren't
> making any progress.
Go, grep the LKML archives and let those who had problems test your
modifications. Come back when they confirm that it does not change
anything.
You want to change behaviour of the current code, so it's your job to
verify that it does not break anything.
I have been there and done that with the ARM interrupt code
http://www.linutronix.de/index.php?page=testing
I know what I'm talking about.
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-08 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200610070153.k971ren4020838@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
2006-10-08 8:06 ` + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree Thomas Gleixner
2006-10-08 10:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-10-08 14:50 ` Daniel Walker
2006-10-08 14:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-10-08 15:45 ` Daniel Walker
2006-10-08 15:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-10-08 16:18 ` Daniel Walker
2006-10-08 16:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-10-08 17:17 ` Daniel Walker
2006-10-08 19:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-10-08 20:39 ` Daniel Walker
2006-10-08 20:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-10-08 21:15 ` Daniel Walker
2006-10-08 21:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-10-08 21:31 ` Daniel Walker
2006-10-08 21:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-10-08 22:13 ` Daniel Walker
2006-10-08 22:53 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2006-10-08 23:35 ` Daniel Walker
2006-10-09 6:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1160348036.5686.155.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox