From: keith mannthey <kmannth@us.ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: andrew <akpm@osdl.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Konrad redhat <konradr@redhat.com>,
dick zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
lhms-devel <lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Patch] x86_64 hot-add memroy srat.c fix
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:56:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1161024998.5664.17.camel@keithlap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200610161201.16140.ak@suse.de>
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 12:01 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Saturday 07 October 2006 00:53, keith mannthey wrote:
> > This patch corrects the logic used in srat.c to figure out what
> > parsing what action to take when registering hot-add areas. Hot-add
> > areas should only be added to the node information for the
> > MEMORY_HOTPLGU_RESERVE case. When booting MEMORY_HOTPLUG_SPARSE hot-add
> > areas on everything but the last node are getting include in the node
> > data and during kernel boot the pages are setup then the kernel dies
> > when the pages are used. This patch fixes this issue. It is based
> > against 2.6.19-rc1.
>
> Added thanks, especially since it's a obvious typo.
Yea... Something pre 2.6.19 was removing the e820 reserved area before
the nodes were brought online (and thus masking the problem during
testing).
> If that patch was added to .19 does sparsemem hotadd work then or does it
> need more patches?
SPARSEMEM hot-add will work in .19 if this patch is applied.
Thanks,
Keith
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-16 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-06 22:53 [Patch] x86_64 hot-add memroy srat.c fix keith mannthey
2006-10-16 10:01 ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-16 18:56 ` keith mannthey [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1161024998.5664.17.camel@keithlap \
--to=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=konradr@redhat.com \
--cc=lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox