public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Udo van den Heuvel <udovdh@xs4all.nl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18 w/ GPS time source: worse performance
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:17:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1161213459.5875.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1161207996.15860.134.camel@mindpipe>

On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 17:46 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> [added John Stultz to cc]
> 
> On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 15:57 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:44:59 +0200, Udo van den Heuvel said:
> > > 
> > > It is stuff that is visible by watching ntpq -pn output, by letting mrtg
> > > graph stuff, etc. Watch the offset and jitter collumns.
> > > Check /usr/sbin/ntpdc -c kerninfo output. Graph that stuff.
> > 
> > So... you've presumably done that while identifying there is an issue.
> > Please share the results.  Have you tried booting back into a 2.6.17
> > or so and seen offset/jitter improve?  etc etc etc.

Udo: 
	Are you running the linuxpps patches, or is this vanilla 2.6.18 without
any additional patches? Mind sending your dmesg and some "ntpdc -c
kerninfo" output? Any of those graphs you mention above would be great
as well.

thanks
-john



  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-18 23:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-17 15:25 2.6.18 w/ GPS time source: worse performance Udo van den Heuvel
2006-10-17 16:46 ` Lee Revell
2006-10-17 17:07   ` Udo van den Heuvel
2006-10-18 15:20   ` Udo van den Heuvel
2006-10-18 16:36     ` Lee Revell
2006-10-18 16:44       ` Udo van den Heuvel
2006-10-18 19:57         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-10-18 21:46           ` Lee Revell
2006-10-18 23:17             ` john stultz [this message]
2006-10-19 14:12               ` Udo van den Heuvel
2006-10-19 14:14           ` Udo van den Heuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1161213459.5875.52.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=udovdh@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox