From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
Cc: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>,
Manish Lachwani <mlachwani@mvista.com>,
bastien.dugue@bull.net
Subject: Re: -rt7 announcement? (was Re: 2.6.18-rt6)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:59:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1161629955.22373.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b0610231144s420c1523p43af2a8349bac04@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 11:44 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> Some differences/questions between 2.6.18-rt6 and 2.6.18-rt7:
>
> In 2.6.18-rt6, using make menuconfig, there were options on the
> front page for HRT Support. This seems to have moved under Processor
> Type with 2.6.18-rt7. Was that on purpose?
Yes
> In 2.6.18-rt6 I turned on HRT support, left 1000 nanoseconds for
> the timing, but did not enable dynamic ticks since I wasn't sure it
> was OK on AMD64. Should I be using DynTicks with an AMD64 single
> processor? With a dual-processor?
Should work
> On 2.6.18-rt7 it seems there is no time value setting or it's been
> moved somewhere I haven't found. does that 1000 nanosecond time
> setting still apply?
Basically yes. It is handled internally.
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-23 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-18 8:39 2.6.18-rt6 Ingo Molnar
2006-10-18 9:14 ` 2.6.18-rt6 Sébastien Dugué
2006-10-18 10:05 ` 2.6.18-rt6 Ingo Molnar
2006-10-18 14:53 ` 2.6.18-rt6 Paul E. McKenney
2006-10-18 21:07 ` 2.6.18-rt6 Esben Nielsen
2006-10-20 0:23 ` 2.6.18-rt6 Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-10-20 0:59 ` 2.6.18-rt6 john stultz
2006-10-23 20:33 ` 2.6.18-rt6 and compile fail with rt7 on x86_64 Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-10-20 15:00 ` 2.6.18-rt6 Lee Revell
2006-10-20 15:53 ` 2.6.18-rt6 Mark Knecht
2006-10-23 16:34 ` -rt7 announcement? (was Re: 2.6.18-rt6) Lee Revell
2006-10-23 18:29 ` Mark Knecht
2006-10-23 18:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-10-23 18:44 ` Mark Knecht
2006-10-23 18:59 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2006-10-23 20:09 ` Mark Knecht
2006-10-23 18:49 ` Lee Revell
2006-10-23 18:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-10-23 20:26 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-10-23 20:40 ` Lee Revell
2006-10-24 1:26 ` -rt7 announcement? (was Re: 2.6.18-rt6) and more info about a compile error Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-10-24 4:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-10-24 16:48 ` Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1161629955.22373.40.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=bastien.dugue@bull.net \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markknecht@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mlachwani@mvista.com \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox