From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use extents for recording what swap is allocated.
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:04:10 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1161644650.7033.23.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061023153257.GC8414@elf.ucw.cz>
Hi.
On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 17:32 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Switch from bitmaps to using extents to record what swap is allocated;
> > they make more efficient use of memory, particularly where the allocated
> > storage is small and the swap space is large.
>
> > This is also part of the ground work for implementing support for
> > supporting multiple swap devices.
>
> bitmaps were more efficient and longer than original code... I did not
> _like_ them, but they are in now. I'd hate to change the code again,
> for what, 0.5% gain?
0.5% of what? This is part of what is needed to implement support for
multiple swap devices. You could extend what you already have,
implementing bitmaps that require a bit for every page of swap the user
has swapon'd, but that doesn't seem efficient to me.
> ...and this is still longer than bitmaps.
>
> And SNAPSHOT_GET_SWAP_PAGE seems to support multiple swap spaces
> already.
It may do, but swap.c certainly doesn't. It supports exactly one device.
Regards,
Nigel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-23 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-23 4:14 [PATCH] Use extents for recording what swap is allocated Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-23 15:32 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-23 23:04 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2006-10-24 8:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-24 20:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-24 21:34 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-24 21:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-24 22:15 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-24 22:19 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-24 22:30 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-25 8:11 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-25 8:28 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-25 8:42 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-25 9:01 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-25 9:10 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-25 10:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-25 12:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-27 11:37 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-24 22:13 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-24 22:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-24 23:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-31 11:39 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-24 20:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-10-24 20:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-24 22:06 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-24 22:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-10-24 23:03 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-25 9:17 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-25 10:07 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-25 10:20 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-31 11:38 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-11-01 12:36 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-01 21:19 ` Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1161644650.7033.23.camel@nigel.suspend2.net \
--to=ncunningham@linuxmail.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox