From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Janak Desai <janak@us.ibm.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sys_unshare: remove a broken CLONE_SIGHAND code
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 11:49:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1161683397.24143.14.camel@taijtu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061023155320.GA4208@oleg>
On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 19:53 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> sys_unshare(CLONE_SIGHAND) is broken, the code under 'if (new_sigh)' is
> never executed but very wrong. Just remove it to avoid a confusion,
> task_lock() has nothing to do with ->sighand changing.
>
> Also, change the comment in unshare_sighand(). Yes, CLONE_THREAD implies
> CLONE_SIGHAND, but still it looks confusing. Also, we don't need to check
> current->sighand != NULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Good thing, this confused me when figuring out the ->siglock rules, its
tricky enough without being put off balance by dead code.
> --- rc2-mm2/kernel/fork.c~ 2006-10-22 19:28:17.000000000 +0400
> +++ rc2-mm2/kernel/fork.c 2006-10-23 19:23:19.000000000 +0400
> @@ -1523,15 +1523,13 @@ static int unshare_mnt_namespace(unsigne
> }
>
> /*
> - * Unsharing of sighand for tasks created with CLONE_SIGHAND is not
> - * supported yet
> + * Unsharing of sighand is not supported yet
> */
> static int unshare_sighand(unsigned long unshare_flags, struct sighand_struct **new_sighp)
> {
> struct sighand_struct *sigh = current->sighand;
>
> - if ((unshare_flags & CLONE_SIGHAND) &&
> - (sigh && atomic_read(&sigh->count) > 1))
> + if ((unshare_flags & CLONE_SIGHAND) && atomic_read(&sigh->count) > 1)
> return -EINVAL;
> else
> return 0;
> @@ -1605,7 +1603,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_unshare(unsigned lon
> int err = 0;
> struct fs_struct *fs, *new_fs = NULL;
> struct mnt_namespace *ns, *new_ns = NULL;
> - struct sighand_struct *sigh, *new_sigh = NULL;
> + struct sighand_struct *new_sigh = NULL;
> struct mm_struct *mm, *new_mm = NULL, *active_mm = NULL;
> struct files_struct *fd, *new_fd = NULL;
> struct sem_undo_list *new_ulist = NULL;
> @@ -1650,7 +1648,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_unshare(unsigned lon
> }
> }
>
> - if (new_fs || new_ns || new_sigh || new_mm || new_fd || new_ulist ||
> + if (new_fs || new_ns || new_mm || new_fd || new_ulist ||
> new_uts || new_ipc) {
>
> task_lock(current);
> @@ -1672,12 +1670,6 @@ asmlinkage long sys_unshare(unsigned lon
> new_ns = ns;
> }
>
> - if (new_sigh) {
> - sigh = current->sighand;
> - rcu_assign_pointer(current->sighand, new_sigh);
> - new_sigh = sigh;
> - }
> -
> if (new_mm) {
> mm = current->mm;
> active_mm = current->active_mm;
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-24 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-23 15:53 [PATCH] sys_unshare: remove a broken CLONE_SIGHAND code Oleg Nesterov
2006-10-24 9:49 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1161683397.24143.14.camel@taijtu \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=janak@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox