From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
To: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org, Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Manish Lachwani <mlachwani@mvista.com>,
bastien.dugue@bull.net
Subject: Re: -rt7 announcement? (was Re: 2.6.18-rt6) and more info about a compile error
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:48:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1161708487.2414.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1161664706.22373.48.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Is this new functionality? I thought -rt7 was just moving to the -mm'ish
hrtimers. What's changing the rtmutex?
Daniel
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 06:38 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Index: linux-2.6.18/kernel/rtmutex.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.18.orig/kernel/rtmutex.c 2006-10-24 06:33:02.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.18/kernel/rtmutex.c 2006-10-24 06:31:55.000000000 +0200
> @@ -902,7 +902,10 @@ static inline void rt_reacquire_bkl(int
> }
>
> #else
> -# define rt_release_bkl(x) (-1)
> +static inline int rt_release_bkl(struct rt_mutex *lock, unsigned long flags)
> +{
> + return -1;
> +}
> # define rt_reacquire_bkl(x) do { } while (0)
> #endif
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-24 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-18 8:39 2.6.18-rt6 Ingo Molnar
2006-10-18 9:14 ` 2.6.18-rt6 Sébastien Dugué
2006-10-18 10:05 ` 2.6.18-rt6 Ingo Molnar
2006-10-18 14:53 ` 2.6.18-rt6 Paul E. McKenney
2006-10-18 21:07 ` 2.6.18-rt6 Esben Nielsen
2006-10-20 0:23 ` 2.6.18-rt6 Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-10-20 0:59 ` 2.6.18-rt6 john stultz
2006-10-23 20:33 ` 2.6.18-rt6 and compile fail with rt7 on x86_64 Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-10-20 15:00 ` 2.6.18-rt6 Lee Revell
2006-10-20 15:53 ` 2.6.18-rt6 Mark Knecht
2006-10-23 16:34 ` -rt7 announcement? (was Re: 2.6.18-rt6) Lee Revell
2006-10-23 18:29 ` Mark Knecht
2006-10-23 18:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-10-23 18:44 ` Mark Knecht
2006-10-23 18:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-10-23 20:09 ` Mark Knecht
2006-10-23 18:49 ` Lee Revell
2006-10-23 18:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-10-23 20:26 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-10-23 20:40 ` Lee Revell
2006-10-24 1:26 ` -rt7 announcement? (was Re: 2.6.18-rt6) and more info about a compile error Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-10-24 4:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-10-24 16:48 ` Daniel Walker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1161708487.2414.20.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=bastien.dugue@bull.net \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mlachwani@mvista.com \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox