Re: [PATCH ??] Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper

Florin Malita
2006-10-27T21:32:49Z

Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> (it's a separate question if ndiswrapper should be in this table;
> driverloader should be, it's non-GPL at all, so that part of your patch
> is broken)
>

If driverloader is not GPLed then why does it need to be treated
exceptionally to begin with? It taints the kernel anyway because of its
license.

---
fm