From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@jikos.cz>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: spin_lock_irqsave_nested() -v2
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:40:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1162215648.24143.186.camel@taijtu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061030131241.GA1657@ff.dom.local>
*sigh*, I truly am cursed today :-(
how about this...
---
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: spin_lock_irqsave_nested()
Introduce spin_lock_irqsave_nested(); implementation from:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/6/1/122
Patch from:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/13/258
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jikos@jikos.cz>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
include/linux/spinlock.h | 6 ++++++
include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h | 2 ++
kernel/spinlock.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ void __lockfunc _read_lock_irq(rwlock_t
void __lockfunc _write_lock_irq(rwlock_t *lock) __acquires(lock);
unsigned long __lockfunc _spin_lock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock)
__acquires(lock);
+unsigned long __lockfunc _spin_lock_irqsave_nested(spinlock_t *lock, int subclass)
+ __acquires(lock);
unsigned long __lockfunc _read_lock_irqsave(rwlock_t *lock)
__acquires(lock);
unsigned long __lockfunc _write_lock_irqsave(rwlock_t *lock)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/spinlock.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/spinlock.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/spinlock.h
@@ -186,10 +186,16 @@ do { \
#define spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) flags = _spin_lock_irqsave(lock)
#define read_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) flags = _read_lock_irqsave(lock)
#define write_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) flags = _write_lock_irqsave(lock)
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+#define spin_lock_irqsave_nested(lock, flags, subclass) flags = _spin_lock_irqsave_nested(lock, subclass)
+#else
+#define spin_lock_irqsave_nested(lock, flags, subclass) flags = _spin_lock_irqsave(lock)
+#endif
#else
#define spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) _spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags)
#define read_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) _read_lock_irqsave(lock, flags)
#define write_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) _write_lock_irqsave(lock, flags)
+#define spin_lock_irqsave_nested(lock, flags, subclass) _spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags)
#endif
#define spin_lock_irq(lock) _spin_lock_irq(lock)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/spinlock.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/spinlock.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/spinlock.c
@@ -294,6 +294,28 @@ void __lockfunc _spin_lock_nested(spinlo
EXPORT_SYMBOL(_spin_lock_nested);
+unsigned long __lockfunc _spin_lock_irqsave_nested(spinlock_t *lock, int subclass)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ preempt_disable();
+ spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, subclass, 0, _RET_IP_);
+ /*
+ * On lockdep we dont want the hand-coded irq-enable of
+ * _raw_spin_lock_flags() code, because lockdep assumes
+ * that interrupts are not re-enabled during lock-acquire:
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_SPIN_LOCKING
+ _raw_spin_lock(lock);
+#else
+ _raw_spin_lock_flags(lock, &flags);
+#endif
+ return flags;
+}
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(_spin_lock_irqsave_nested);
+
#endif
void __lockfunc _spin_unlock(spinlock_t *lock)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-30 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-30 9:03 [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: spin_lock_irqsave_nested() Peter Zijlstra
2006-10-30 9:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] lockdep: annotate bcsp driver Peter Zijlstra
2006-10-30 9:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-10-30 9:30 ` Marcel Holtmann
2006-10-30 9:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] lockdep: annotate bcsp driver - v2 Peter Zijlstra
2006-10-30 9:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: spin_lock_irqsave_nested() Ingo Molnar
2006-10-30 13:12 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-10-30 13:27 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-10-30 13:40 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2006-10-30 14:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: spin_lock_irqsave_nested() -v2 Jarek Poplawski
2006-10-31 6:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: spin_lock_irqsave_nested() Andrew Morton
2006-10-31 7:25 ` [PATCH] splice : two smp_mb() can be omitted Eric Dumazet
2006-10-31 7:32 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-31 7:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-31 7:46 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-31 9:40 ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-31 9:49 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-31 10:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-31 22:16 ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-31 23:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-31 23:45 ` Nick Piggin
2006-11-02 17:02 ` [PATCH] splice : Must fully check for fifos Eric Dumazet
2006-11-02 17:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-11-02 19:07 ` Jens Axboe
2006-11-03 8:50 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1162215648.24143.186.camel@taijtu \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=jikos@jikos.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox