Re: [PATCH] Use extents for recording what swap is allocated.

[Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>]

Hi.

On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 13:36 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi.
> > 
> > On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 21:42 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 02:14:17PM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > > > Switch from bitmaps to using extents to record what swap is allocated;
> > > > they make more efficient use of memory, particularly where the allocated
> > > > storage is small and the swap space is large.
> > > >     
> > > > This is also part of the ground work for implementing support for
> > > > supporting multiple swap devices.
> > > 
> > > In addition to the very useful comments from Rafael there's some observations
> > > of my own:
> > > 
> > >  - there's an awful lot of opencoded list manipulation, any chance you
> > >    could use list.h instead?
> > 
> > Further to this, I gave using list.h a go. Unfortunately it doesn't look
> > to me like it is a good idea: in adding a range, I'm comparing the new
> > range to the maximum of one extent and the minimum of the next, so
> > finding the minimum of the next extent becomes a lot uglier than it
> > currently is. Currently it's just ->next->minimum, but with list.h, I'd
> > need container_of(current->list.next)->minimum. Or am I missing
> > something?
> 
> That does not look that scary... just do it.

It currently makes more sense to me to stick with what I already have
because it's simpler and more readable.

Regards,

Nigel