public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Karl MacMillan <kmacmillan@mentalrootkit.com>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	jmorris@namei.org, chrisw@sous-sol.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aviro@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Security issues with local filesystem caching
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 11:29:24 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1162484964.6503.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1162403134.32614.242.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>

On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 12:45 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 10:58 -0500, Karl MacMillan wrote:

<snip>


> > fssid seems like the wrong name, though it does match the DAC concept.
> > This is really more general impersonation of another domain by the
> > kernel and might have other uses.
> 
> NFS will want a fssid in order to have file access checks applied
> against the client process' SID if/when the client process' context
> becomes available.

I was suggesting that it might be helpful if this applied to all checks
- not just file access - and would therefore need a different name.

Karl


  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-02 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-25 10:14 Security issues with local filesystem caching David Howells
2006-10-25 16:52 ` Nate Diller
2006-10-25 16:48   ` Jeff V. Merkey
2006-10-25 17:21     ` David Howells
2006-10-25 17:42       ` Jeff V. Merkey
2006-10-25 18:15         ` David Howells
2006-10-25 20:21 ` Josef Sipek
2006-10-25 20:28   ` Josef Sipek
2006-10-26  9:56   ` David Howells
2006-10-27 15:54     ` Josef Sipek
2006-10-25 21:12 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-26 10:40   ` David Howells
2006-10-26 12:51     ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-26 16:04       ` David Howells
2006-10-26 16:34         ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-26 17:09           ` David Howells
2006-10-26 17:45             ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-26 22:53               ` David Howells
2006-10-27 14:48                 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-27 15:42                   ` David Howells
2006-10-27 16:10                     ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-27 16:25                       ` David Howells
2006-10-27 17:09                         ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-27 17:34                           ` David Howells
2006-10-27 14:41               ` David Howells
2006-10-25 23:37 ` Alan Cox
2006-10-26  0:32   ` Al Viro
2006-10-26 10:45     ` David Howells
2006-10-26 10:54     ` Alan Cox
2006-10-26  9:14 ` Jan Dittmer
2006-10-26 10:55   ` David Howells
2006-10-26 11:52   ` Alan Cox
2006-10-31 21:26 ` David Howells
2006-11-01 13:28   ` Stephen Smalley
2006-11-01 15:34     ` David Howells
2006-11-01 15:58       ` Karl MacMillan
2006-11-01 17:45         ` Stephen Smalley
2006-11-02 16:29           ` Karl MacMillan [this message]
2006-11-02 18:04             ` Stephen Smalley
2006-11-01 17:30       ` Stephen Smalley
2006-11-02 17:16         ` David Howells
2006-11-02 19:49           ` Trond Myklebust
2006-11-02 20:38             ` David Howells
2006-11-02 21:24               ` Trond Myklebust
2006-11-03 10:27                 ` David Howells
2006-11-03 13:41                   ` Trond Myklebust
2006-11-03 15:23                     ` David Howells
2006-11-03 17:30                       ` Trond Myklebust
2006-11-14 19:22                         ` David Howells
2006-11-15 14:05                           ` Trond Myklebust
2006-11-15 15:28                             ` David Howells
2006-11-15 16:41                               ` Trond Myklebust
2006-11-15 18:17                                 ` David Howells
2006-11-03 15:33                     ` David Howells
2006-11-02 20:33           ` Stephen Smalley
2006-11-02 21:05             ` David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1162484964.6503.9.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=kmacmillan@mentalrootkit.com \
    --cc=aviro@redhat.com \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox