public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr>,
	Rajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@intel.com>,
	toralf.foerster@gmx.de, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 21:55:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1162504537.11965.238.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061102121027.676db964.akpm@osdl.org>

Ar Iau, 2006-11-02 am 12:10 -0800, ysgrifennodd Andrew Morton:
> Balls are being dropped.
> 
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7082
> 
> So this was a good patch but because of a bug in ne2k-pci which nobody is
> fixing we need to drop it?

I believe the patch is fundamentally wrong. We don't *need* to drop the
IO decode in this case. We don't want to drop it when the BIOS lacks the
brains to put it back. We will also kill some machines doing it as they
have devices we attach drivers to which are not just managing the
function Linux knows about but also many other things. Take the CS5520
for example, generically disable the I/O on that because we have an IDE
driver attached to it and you kill the box stone dead, as its also the
video and a few other things behind the scenes. That is not atypical.

IFF someone has a device that actually needs to disable I/O cycles, well
they can do it themselves.

Alan


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-11-02 21:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-31  4:27 Linux 2.6.19-rc4 Linus Torvalds
2006-10-31  5:34 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-31 14:43   ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2006-10-31 16:44     ` Linux 2.6.19-rc4: udev compatibility broken? Mark Lord
2006-10-31 15:55   ` Linux 2.6.19-rc4 Linus Torvalds
2006-10-31 16:14     ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-10-31 16:34       ` Ray Lee
2006-10-31 16:51         ` Dave Jones
2006-10-31 21:26           ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-10-31 22:39             ` Al Viro
2006-11-02 16:03               ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-10-31 20:53         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-10-31 21:29           ` Al Viro
2006-11-01  6:33           ` Willy Tarreau
2006-11-01 20:26             ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2006-11-01 21:04               ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-11-02 21:19                 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2006-10-31 18:33       ` Adrian Bunk
2006-10-31 18:36         ` Martin Bligh
2006-10-31 18:54           ` Adrian Bunk
2006-10-31 18:45       ` Adrian Bunk
2006-10-31 19:26       ` Russell King
2006-10-31 19:39         ` Martin Bligh
2006-10-31 17:02 ` CONFIG_USB_USBNET and mii_* (was Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc4) Athanasius
2006-10-31 17:11   ` Randy Dunlap
2006-10-31 19:56 ` 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions Adrian Bunk
2006-10-31 20:11   ` Greg KH
2006-11-04  3:15     ` Adrian Bunk
2006-10-31 20:12   ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-31 20:21     ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-02 20:02   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-02 20:10     ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-02 21:22       ` Auke Kok
2006-11-02 21:55       ` Alan Cox [this message]
2006-11-02 20:54     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-11-02 21:29       ` Greg KH
2006-11-02 21:26     ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-02 21:40       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-31 20:08 ` 2.6.19-rc4: known regressions with patches Adrian Bunk
     [not found] ` <20061103024132.GG13381@stusta.de>
2006-11-03  2:56   ` [discuss] Linux 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2) Dave Jones
2006-11-03  8:25     ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-11-03 15:56       ` Dave Jones
2006-11-05 17:32         ` Christian
2006-11-05 20:04           ` Dave Jones
2006-11-06 17:35             ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-06 17:49               ` Dave Jones
2006-11-06  6:00           ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-06 15:43             ` Christian
2006-11-06 17:20               ` Dave Jones
2006-11-06 17:30                 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-06 17:37               ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-04 18:21   ` [linux-usb-devel] " Greg KH
     [not found] ` <20061105064801.GV13381@stusta.de>
2006-11-05 13:26   ` 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v3) Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-11-05 13:57     ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-05 15:17   ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07  4:22     ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-07  5:18       ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-11-07  8:50         ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07 16:19           ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-11-07 17:33             ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07 17:37               ` Dave Olson
2006-11-07 18:20                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07 20:30                   ` Dave Olson
2006-11-07 20:51                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07 21:01                       ` Dave Olson
2006-11-07 21:35                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07 21:41                           ` Dave Olson
2006-11-07 22:25                             ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07 18:01               ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-11-07 18:29                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07 21:32               ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-11-07 22:00                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-08  5:14                   ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-11-08 11:11                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-05 15:22   ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-06 12:48 ` 2.6.19-rc4: known regressions with patches (v2) Adrian Bunk
2006-11-07 13:30 ` 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v4) Adrian Bunk
     [not found] ` <200611070317.42230.earny@net4u.de>
     [not found]   ` <200611070041.28008.len.brown@intel.com>
     [not found]     ` <200611072105.50178.earny@net4u.de>
2006-11-08  8:36       ` [linux-pm] 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v3) Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1162504537.11965.238.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=laurent.riffard@free.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rajesh.shah@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=toralf.foerster@gmx.de \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox