Re: 2.6.19-rc6-rt0, -rt YUM repository

[Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>]

On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 17:17 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 23:07 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > [...] Should we start a known regression list?
> > > 
> > > please resend the bugs that still trigger for you with 2.6.19-rt0.
> > 
> > I'm working with the developers of the 64Studio distro who are 
> > attempting to ship a stable -rt kernel so I have access to lots of 
> > good bug reports.  Oops on boot is by far the most common.  I'll post 
> > details once we've retested with 2.6.19-rt0.
> 
> thanks, please do that. Right now i have no open boot-crash regression 
> left that i can reproduce.


Should we pull in Steve's patch for these, or are you just grabbing
Jeff's tree? I noticed they aren't always commented "shut up gcc"  .

--- linux.orig/arch/i386/kernel/efi.c
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/efi.c
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ void efi_memmap_walk(efi_freemem_callbac
        struct range {
                unsigned long start;
                unsigned long end;
-       } prev, curr;
+       } prev = { } /* shut up gcc */ , curr = { } /* shut up gcc */ ;
        efi_memory_desc_t *md;
        unsigned long start, end;
        void *p;