From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933597AbWKQRrq (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Nov 2006 12:47:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933745AbWKQRrq (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Nov 2006 12:47:46 -0500 Received: from homer.mvista.com ([63.81.120.158]:1759 "EHLO gateway-1237.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933597AbWKQRrp (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Nov 2006 12:47:45 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow NULL pointers in percpu_free From: Daniel Walker To: Alan Stern Cc: Andrew Morton , Venkatesh Pallipadi , Jens Axboe , Christoph Lameter , Pedro Roque , "David S. Miller" , "Paul E. McKenney" , Kernel development list In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:47:33 -0800 Message-Id: <1163785653.3097.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 (2.6.3-1.fc5.5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 12:36 -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > void percpu_free(void *__pdata) > { > + if (!__pdata) > + return; Should be unlikely() right? Daniel