From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757400AbWKWTDX (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:03:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757443AbWKWTDX (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:03:23 -0500 Received: from amsfep17-int.chello.nl ([213.46.243.15]:5914 "EHLO amsfep18-int.chello.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757400AbWKWTDW (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:03:22 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Lumpy Reclaim V3 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Andy Whitcroft Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:02:59 +0100 Message-Id: <1164308579.3878.6.camel@lappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 16:48 +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > lumpy-reclaim-v2 -- Peter Zijlstra's lumpy reclaim prototype, > > lumpy-cleanup-a-missplaced-comment-and-simplify-some-code -- > cleanups to move a comment back to where it came from, to make > the area edge selection more comprehensible and also cleans up > the switch coding style to match the concensus in mm/*.c, Sure looks better. > lumpy-ensure-we-respect-zone-boundaries -- bug fix to ensure we do > not attempt to take pages from adjacent zones, and Valid case I guess :-) > lumpy-take-the-other-active-inactive-pages-in-the-area -- patch to > increase aggression over the targetted order. Yeah, I see how this will help. Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra for all 3