From: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: PMTMR running too fast
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 07:41:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1165304498.5499.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1165263296.6152.8.camel@localhost.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2413 bytes --]
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 12:14 -0800, john stultz wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 19:40 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 11:19 -0800, john stultz wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 13:50 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > In older kernels arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_pm.c:verify_pmtmr_rate
> > > > contained a check for sensible PMTMR rate and disabled that clocksource
> > > > if it was found to be out of spec[0]. This check seems to have been lost
> > > > in the transition to drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c, the removal is in
> > > > 61743fe445213b87fb55a389c8d073785323ca3e "Time: i386 Conversion - part
> > > > 4: Remove Old timer_opts Code"[1] and the check is not present in the
> > > > replacement 5d0cf410e94b1f1ff852c3f210d22cc6c5a27ffa "Time: i386
> > > > Clocksource Drivers"[2].
> > >
> > > Fedora has a bug covering this:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211902
> >
> > > > Is there a specific reason the check was removed (I couldn't see on in
> > > > the archives) or was it simply overlooked? Without it I need to pass
> > > > clocksource=tsc to have 2.6.18 work correctly on an older K6 system with
> > > > an Aladdin chipset (will dig out the precise details if required). Would
> > > > a patch to reintroduce the check be acceptable or would some sort of
> > > > blacklist based solution be more acceptable?
> > >
> > > If I recall correctly, it was pulled because there was some question as
> > > to if it was actually needed (x86_64 didn't need it) and it slows down
> > > the boot time (although not by much).
> > >
> > > I'm fine just re-adding it. Although if the number of affected systems
> > > are small we could just blacklist it (Ian, mind sending dmidecode
> > > output?).
>
> I don't have a dev box to test on at the moment, but here's a quick hack
> attempt at re-adding the code. Does the following work for you?
I get:
PM-Timer running at invalid rate: 200% of normal - aborting.
...
Time: pit clocksource has been installed.
Without the clocksource parameter.
Should tsc be preferred to pit though?
/sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource now
shows "jiffies tsc pit" and current_clocksource is "pit".
Thanks,
Ian.
--
Ian Campbell
love, n.:
When it's growing, you don't mind watering it with a few tears.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-05 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-03 13:50 PMTMR running too fast Ian Campbell
2006-12-04 19:19 ` john stultz
2006-12-04 19:40 ` Ian Campbell
2006-12-04 20:14 ` john stultz
2006-12-05 7:41 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2006-12-05 19:34 ` john stultz
2006-12-06 8:14 ` Ian Campbell
2006-12-06 19:46 ` Ian Campbell
2006-12-06 16:44 ` Andi Kleen
2006-12-06 19:28 ` john stultz
2006-12-06 20:14 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1165304498.5499.62.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ijc@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox