Re: [PATCH 0/3] New firewire stack

[Ben Collins <ben.collins@ubuntu.com>]

On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 09:56 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> (Adding Cc: linux1394-devel)
> 
> Ben Collins wrote at linux-kernel:
> > On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 18:21 -0500, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> >> Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 12:22:29AM -0500, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> >>>> I'm announcing an alternative firewire stack that I've been working on 
> >>>> the last few weeks.
> >>> Is mainline firewire so hopeless, that you've decided to rewrite it? Could
> >>> you show some ugly places in it?
> >> Yes.  I'm not doing this lightheartedly.  It's a lot of work and it will
> >> introduce regressions and instability for a little while.
> >>
> >> My main point about ohci1394 (the old stacks PCI driver) is, that if you
> >> really want to fix the issues with this driver, you have to shuffle the code
> >> around so much that you'll introduce as many regressions as a clean rewrite.
> >> The big problems in the ohci1394 drivers is the irq_handler, bus reset
> >> handling and config rom handling.  These are some of the strong points of
> >> fw-ohci.c:
> > 
> > My main concern is that when I picked up ieee1394 maint myself, it was
> > because it was not big-endian or 64-bit friendly.
> 
> I would like to see new development efforts take cleanliness WRT host
> byte order and 64bit architectures into account from the ground up. (I
> understand though why Kristian made the announcement in this early
> phase, and I agree with him that this kind of development has to go into
> the open early.)

And yet endianness is not the focus from the ground up in Kristian's
work. That was my point.