From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5][time][x86_64] GENERIC_TIME patchset for x86_64
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:47:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1166644078.5996.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200612201926.kBKJQoqN020967@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 14:26 -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:20:39 EST, john stultz said:
> > I didn't hear any objections (or really, any comments) on my
> > last release, so as I mentioned then, I want to go ahead and push this
> > to Andrew for a bit of testing in -mm. Hopefully targeting for
> > inclusion in 2.6.21 or 2.6.22.
>
> Am running it on a Dell Latitude D820 (Core2 T7200 cpu). I had to un-do
> 4 conflicting patches in -rc1-mm1 and then it applied and ran clean, I still
> need to look at re-merging them:
Doh. Oh right, I should have checked against -mm for conflicts.
> hpet-avoid-warning-message-livelock.patch
> clockevents-i386-hpet-driver.patch
> get-rid-of-arch_have_xtime_lock.patch
> x86_64-mm-amd-tsc-sync.patch
>
> It *looks* like all the pieces are there except a few lines of Kconfig
> magic to wire up the dynticks/NO_HZ stuff - or did I miss something crucial?
Yea, I will rework the patches ontop of -mm.
thanks
-john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-20 19:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-20 1:20 [PATCH 0/5][time][x86_64] GENERIC_TIME patchset for x86_64 john stultz
2006-12-20 1:20 ` [PATCH 1/5][time][generic] vsyscall-gtod support for GENERIC_TIME john stultz
2006-12-20 1:20 ` [PATCH 2/5][time][x86_64] hpet_address cleanup john stultz
2006-12-20 1:20 ` [PATCH 3/5][time][x86_64] Split x86_64/kernel/time.c up john stultz
2006-12-20 1:21 ` [PATCH 4/5][time][x86_64] Convert x86_64 to use GENERIC_TIME john stultz
2006-12-20 1:21 ` [PATCH 5/5][time][x86_64] Re-enable vsyscall support for x86_64 john stultz
2006-12-20 19:26 ` [PATCH 0/5][time][x86_64] GENERIC_TIME patchset " Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-12-20 19:47 ` john stultz [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-29 3:00 john stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1166644078.5996.2.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox