Re: libata error handling

Kasper Sandberg
2007-01-06T18:58:01Z

On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 12:21 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > i have heard that libata has much better error handling (this is what
> > made me try it), and from initial observations, that appears to be very
> > true, however, im wondering, is there something i can do to get
> > extremely verbose information from libata? for example if it corrects
> > errors? cause i'd really like to know if it still happens, and if i
> > perhaps get corruption as before, even though not severe.
>
> Any errors, timeouts or retries would be showing up in dmesg..
how sure can i be of this? is it 100% sure that i have not encountered
this error then?
>