From: Rodney Gordon II <meff@pobox.com>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: "mdew ." <some.nzguy@gmail.com>,
ck@vds.kolivas.org,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: 2.6.20-ck1
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 00:15:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1171779357.4740.5.camel@ghreen.sphere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cone.1171766339.618918.14587.501@kolivas.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1018 bytes --]
On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 13:38 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> mdew . writes:
>
> > On 2/16/07, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> >> This patchset is designed to improve system responsiveness and interactivity.
> >> It is configurable to any workload but the default -ck patch is aimed at the
> >> desktop and -cks is available with more emphasis on serverspace.
> >>
> >> Apply to 2.6.20
> >
> > any benchmarks for 2.6.20-ck vs 2.6.20?
>
> Would some -ck user on the mailing list like to perform a set of interbench
> benchmarks? They're pretty straight forward to do; see:
>
> http://interbench.kolivas.org
>
> --
> -ck
Here are some benches comparing 2.6.18-4-686 (Debian sid stock) and
2.6.20-ck1-mt1 (2.6.20-ck1 + sched-idleprio-1.11-2.0.patch)
I know it's not what was asked for, but it might be useful for review of
anyone using Debian kernels considering ck patches :)
Take a look.
-r
--
Rodney "meff" Gordon II -*- meff@pobox.com
Systems Administrator / Coder Geek -*- Open yourself to OpenSource
[-- Attachment #2: 2.6.18-4-686.log --]
[-- Type: text/x-log, Size: 2170 bytes --]
Using 1816966 loops per ms, running every load for 30 seconds
Benchmarking kernel 2.6.18-4-686 at datestamp 200702172244
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Audio in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.005 +/- 0.00545 0.008 100 100
Video 0.086 +/- 0.661 6.7 100 100
X 0.03 +/- 0.272 5.32 100 100
Burn 0.005 +/- 0.00565 0.01 100 100
Write 0.043 +/- 0.281 5.28 100 100
Read 0.01 +/- 0.0293 0.537 100 100
Compile 0.013 +/- 0.119 2.91 100 100
Memload 0.033 +/- 0.289 6.2 100 100
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Video in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.024 +/- 0.556 16.7 100 99.9
X 0.874 +/- 3.78 16.7 100 94.9
Burn 0.005 +/- 0.00559 0.008 100 100
Write 0.128 +/- 1.36 24.6 100 99.6
Read 0.524 +/- 2.93 16.7 100 96.9
Compile 0.136 +/- 1.43 17.3 100 99.3
Memload 0.751 +/- 3.48 17.3 100 95.7
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of X in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.293 +/- 1.34 10 92.3 89.2
Video 0.606 +/- 2.32 18 89.8 84.6
Burn 0.526 +/- 1.93 10 90.6 85.1
Write 1.35 +/- 7.79 92 87.4 84
Read 2.3 +/- 7.4 44 78.8 72
Compile 2.09 +/- 7.75 72 78.5 72.9
Memload 0.767 +/- 2.82 24 87.5 82.2
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU
None 2.64 +/- 9.31 50.6 97.4
Video 0.063 +/- 0.297 5.07 99.9
X 0.061 +/- 0.377 6.48 99.9
Burn 183 +/- 194 400 35.3
Write 1.32 +/- 6.21 80.9 98.7
Read 4.98 +/- 7 34.5 95.3
Compile 210 +/- 228 449 32.3
Memload 4.57 +/- 11.2 83 95.6
[-- Attachment #3: 2.6.20-ck1-mt1.log --]
[-- Type: text/x-log, Size: 2172 bytes --]
Using 1816966 loops per ms, running every load for 30 seconds
Benchmarking kernel 2.6.20-ck1-mt1 at datestamp 200702172307
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Audio in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.005 +/- 0.00517 0.009 100 100
Video 0.016 +/- 0.017 0.022 100 100
X 0.018 +/- 0.13 3.17 100 100
Burn 0.005 +/- 0.00551 0.013 100 100
Write 0.016 +/- 0.0489 1.07 100 100
Read 0.016 +/- 0.102 2.48 100 100
Compile 0.051 +/- 0.421 7 100 100
Memload 0.012 +/- 0.08 1.55 100 100
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Video in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.088 +/- 1.18 16.7 100 99.5
X 0.014 +/- 0.0153 0.026 100 100
Burn 0.005 +/- 0.00553 0.016 100 100
Write 0.057 +/- 0.734 16.7 100 99.8
Read 0.016 +/- 0.0187 0.21 100 100
Compile 0.042 +/- 0.328 5.59 100 100
Memload 0.014 +/- 0.0883 1.93 100 100
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of X in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.033 +/- 0.258 2 98.7 97.7
Video 0.033 +/- 0.258 2 98.7 97.7
Burn 0.046 +/- 0.337 3 98.4 97
Write 0.129 +/- 0.777 7 96.5 94.4
Read 0.292 +/- 1.75 18 94.4 91.6
Compile 0.473 +/- 2.66 28 92 89
Memload 0.178 +/- 0.98 8 96.8 93.8
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU
None 0.124 +/- 0.126 0.369 99.9
Video 0.439 +/- 0.44 0.459 99.6
X 0.444 +/- 0.469 2.98 99.6
Burn 198 +/- 236 280 33.6
Write 0.509 +/- 0.752 7.59 99.5
Read 2.02 +/- 4.93 31.8 98
Compile 201 +/- 239 299 33.2
Memload 3.39 +/- 5.18 31.3 96.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-18 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-16 10:10 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-16 15:47 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Malte Schröder
2007-02-16 21:35 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Edouard Gomez
2007-02-16 21:45 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Edouard Gomez
2007-02-17 0:53 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Chuck Ebbert
2007-02-17 1:13 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-17 2:15 ` [ck] 2.6.20-ck1 michael chang
2007-02-17 3:17 ` Con Kolivas
2007-02-17 17:28 ` michael chang
2007-02-17 18:45 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-02-17 21:00 ` Con Kolivas
2007-02-17 21:50 ` michael chang
2007-02-17 23:47 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-18 0:39 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-18 0:41 ` [ck] 2.6.20-ck1 Radoslaw Szkodzinski
2007-02-18 0:45 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-17 11:15 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Hugo Vanwoerkom
2007-02-18 2:14 ` 2.6.20-ck1 mdew .
2007-02-18 2:38 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-18 6:05 ` [ck] 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-18 6:15 ` Rodney Gordon II [this message]
2007-02-18 6:20 ` Rodney Gordon II
2007-02-18 16:54 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Ryan M.
2007-02-18 19:00 ` [ck] 2.6.20-ck1 Ash Milsted
2007-02-24 12:12 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Fabio Comolli
2007-02-25 4:34 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Gene Heskett
2007-02-25 10:32 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-25 16:33 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Gene Heskett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1171779357.4740.5.camel@ghreen.sphere \
--to=meff@pobox.com \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=some.nzguy@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox