Re[2]: Can't mount an ext3 partition - why?

Re[2]: Can't mount an ext3 partition - why?

[Igor Krasnoselski]

Hello Herbert,

HP> what does an  fsck.ext3 -fpn  on the unmounted filesystem report?

I downloaded 2.4.21 sources, made "make oldconfig" and got a new
kernel with the same behavior :(

fsck.ext3 (e2fsck 1.27 8-Mar-2002)
run all 5 passes with no error reports under an old kernel, but under
new one it says:

fsck.ext3: No such file or directory while trying to open /dev/hdc1

The superblock could not be read....
etc.

I get further into this, and I find that I have no /dev/hdc1 (and
/dev/hdc, and /dev/hda too) at all! In place of them(?), I have

/dev/discs/~disc0/disc
/dev/discs/~disc0/part1
/dev/discs/~disc0/part2
/dev/discs/~disc0/part3
/dev/discs/~disc1/disc
/dev/discs/~disc1/part1

e2fsck gets them as previous /dev/hd+ args and reports no errors.
Is this a new feature since 2.4.18-3 kernel? Or maybe this all because
I add something strange to my config, like "/dev filesystem" ?

-- 
Best regards,
 Igor                            mailto:iek@tut.by
                                 mailto:u-com@mail.ru

Re[2]: Can't mount an ext3 partition - why?

[Geller Sandor]

On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Igor Krasnoselski wrote:

> e2fsck gets them as previous /dev/hd+ args and reports no errors.
> Is this a new feature since 2.4.18-3 kernel? Or maybe this all because
> I add something strange to my config, like "/dev filesystem" ?

And CONFIG_DEVFS_MOUNT=y , right? Install devfsd, or modify fstab, or use
the devfs=nomount boot parameter.

  Geller Sandor <wildy@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu>

Re: Can't mount an ext3 partition - why?

[Brian Jackson]

devfs will do that, use devfsd to add those legacy device nodes to /dev.

--Brian

On Tuesday 17 June 2003 09:24 am, Igor Krasnoselski wrote:
> Hello Herbert,
>
> HP> what does an  fsck.ext3 -fpn  on the unmounted filesystem report?
>
> I downloaded 2.4.21 sources, made "make oldconfig" and got a new
> kernel with the same behavior :(
>
> fsck.ext3 (e2fsck 1.27 8-Mar-2002)
> run all 5 passes with no error reports under an old kernel, but under
> new one it says:
>
> fsck.ext3: No such file or directory while trying to open /dev/hdc1
>
> The superblock could not be read....
> etc.
>
> I get further into this, and I find that I have no /dev/hdc1 (and
> /dev/hdc, and /dev/hda too) at all! In place of them(?), I have
>
> /dev/discs/~disc0/disc
> /dev/discs/~disc0/part1
> /dev/discs/~disc0/part2
> /dev/discs/~disc0/part3
> /dev/discs/~disc1/disc
> /dev/discs/~disc1/part1
>
> e2fsck gets them as previous /dev/hd+ args and reports no errors.
> Is this a new feature since 2.4.18-3 kernel? Or maybe this all because
> I add something strange to my config, like "/dev filesystem" ?

-- 
OpenGFS -- http://opengfs.sourceforge.net
Home -- http://www.brianandsara.net