From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752788Ab0EYE6J (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2010 00:58:09 -0400 Received: from mtoichi12.ns.itscom.net ([219.110.2.182]:40785 "EHLO mtoichi12.ns.itscom.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751127Ab0EYE6I (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2010 00:58:08 -0400 From: "J. R. Okajima" Subject: Re: proc_dointvec() and write To: Cong Wang Cc: opurdila@ixiacom.com, davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4BFB56F1.1080200@redhat.com> References: <306.1274711539@jrobl> <4BFB56F1.1080200@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 13:57:40 +0900 Message-ID: <11729.1274763460@jrobl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cong Wang: > Hmm, odd, I tested other proc files, I see no problem. > I am wondering why /proc/sys/kernel/printk is special here. The condition is, - the entry has multiple values, .maxlen = N * sizeof(foo) - the entry is writable, .mode = 0644 (or something) In sysctl.c, only "printk" and "acct" match. J. R. Okajima