From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932927AbXCFBbp (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 20:31:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932934AbXCFBbp (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 20:31:45 -0500 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.231]:8356 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932927AbXCFBbo (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 20:31:44 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=Ez+b96cl2SrpAE066NMbbJfPkRKVONEI6GCEeJsP/t1CF7MqEo0cDPQ9PGuXpMC5zYc54xBT8yr/nGW6bxl/zIV3o6QjKs1gz9GXZbIbC0Vvm+EmyCtXSy79fd//tMg9BMp7yLjZgcREiyJfYe8BOewS3Ry45/pH4HFAI7nbHaE= Subject: Re: tdfx framebuffer garbles display in 2.6.19.5 From: "Antonino A. Daplas" To: DervishD Cc: Linux-kernel , Linux Fbdev development list In-Reply-To: <20070301160139.GA102@DervishD> References: <20070226144744.GA3615@DervishD> <1172503471.20842.14.camel@daplas> <20070226171334.GB13496@DervishD> <1172510654.7101.11.camel@daplas> <20070226203223.GA161@DervishD> <1172617755.13422.0.camel@daplas> <20070301160139.GA102@DervishD> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 09:33:37 +0800 Message-Id: <1173144817.7219.1.camel@daplas> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 17:01 +0100, DervishD wrote: > Hi Antonino :) > > * Antonino A. Daplas dixit: > > Can you try this patch? It might help with the screen corruption. > > With the patch, the scroll slows to a crawl and the system is > unusable. The time to scroll 30 lines is about a minute or so (probably > more, I just measured for a while). > > If you want me to test other patches, just tell :) Can you change the mdelay to udelay and use higher/lower delay values to see if there's any improvement? Tony