Re: [PATCH -mm] Blackfin: blackfin i2c driver

["Wu, Bryan" <bryan.wu@analog.com>]

On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 23:14 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 07:58:22 +0100 Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> wrote:
> 
> > > +config BFIN_SDA
> > 
> > I2C_BLACKFIN_SDA
> 
> The blackfin architecture uses "bfin" pretty much universally, so this
> usage is consistent.
> 
> box:/usr/src/25> grep -i blackfin patches/blackfin*|wc -l
>    1608
> box:/usr/src/25> grep -i bfin patches/blackfin*|wc -l
>    6198
> 

Thanks for you understanding, but now we want to move to use
CONFIG_BLACKFIN options. There is a new task in our development plan to
change things to CONFIG_BLACKFIN.

At this moment, we both provide CONFIG_BFIN and CONFIG_BLACKFIN. When
all the things relied on CONFIG_BFIN/bfin are changed to
CONFIG_BLACKFIN/blackfin, the CONFIG_BFIN will be removed.

So here I will follow Jean's comments.

> Let's just hope nobody makes a bluefin.

So it is ok  for both blackfin and bluefin. But I think Black is cooler
than Blue. -:)

> 
> > > +	range 0 15 if (BF533 || BF532 || BF531) 
> > 
> > Trailing whitespace.
> 
> I always remove that when merging a patch.

Thanks a lot, could you please give me a script just to kill this
whitespace? So I can do it before sending you patches.

Thanks Jean and Andrew.
-Bryan