Re: [patch 6/9] signalfd/timerfd v1 - timerfd core ...

Davide Libenzi
2007-03-10T06:38:12Z

On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Nicholas Miell wrote:

> Why did you ignore the existing POSIX timer API?

The existing POSIX API is a standard and a very good one. Too bad it does
not deliver to files. The timerfd code is, as you can probably read from
the code, a really thin wrapper around the existing hrtimer.c Linux code.

- Davide